Search Results for "Building Bye-laws"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "Building Bye-laws"

127 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 127 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Examines Whether Withdrawal of Land Acquisition Under Section 48 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Permissible After Possession Had Already Been Taken. Dispute Centered on Notification Dated 12.04.2001 Withdrawing Acquisition of Survey No.50 Despite Prior Possession and Multiple Dismissals of Challenges by Land Owners.

1 Aug 2026

Judgment Analysis - Auto Generated...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against High Court's Restoration of Land Acquisition Withdrawal Notification Under Section 48 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The appeals raise the issue whether the State Government could validly withdraw from acquisition after possession had been taken, and whether the writ petition by land owners was barred by res judicata.

1 Aug 2026

The dispute pertains to the acquisition of land for the formation of BTM Layout by the Bangalore Development Authority (BDA). In 1977, the State of Ka...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Examines Validity of Notification Withdrawing Land from Acquisition Under Section 48 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 After Possession Taken. Issue Concerns Whether Withdrawal Is Permissible When Acquisition Proceedings Had Attained Finality and Possession Was Taken Years Earlier.

1 Aug 2026

The dispute concerned the validity of a notification under Section 48 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 withdrawing Survey No. 50 (6 acres 20 guntas) ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitions Challenging BBMP Property Tax Reassessment. Court upholds BBMP's power to revise property tax under Section 108A of the Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976, holding that the capital value method is valid and that reassessment does not require prior notice if done in accordance with law.

11 Dec 2023

The judgment involves multiple writ petitions filed by property owners in Bengaluru challenging the reassessment of property tax by the Bruhath Bengal...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Against Termination by District Central Cooperative Bank, Holding It Not a State Under Article 12. Cooperative Bank Employee's Challenge to Dismissal Fails as DCC Bank Is Not an Instrumentality of the State and No Violation of Natural Justice Established.

4 Jul 2019

The petitioner, Kiran Rangnath Kale, was employed as a Manager at the Beed District Central Cooperative Bank (respondent No. 3). He was initially appo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers State Government's Leave Application for Regularization Policy in PILs. Court Examines Whether Draft Policy Violates MRTP Act and Whether Judicial Review Permits Interference with Policy Decisions.

24 Mar 2017

The proceedings arise from two Public Interest Litigations (PIL No. 80 of 2013 and PIL No. 138 of 2012) before the Bombay High Court. In an earlier or...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Maharashtra Fire Prevention Act, 2006 as Constitutionally Valid. Levy of fire prevention fee under Section 12 is a fee, not a tax, and the Act is within legislative competence.

5 Dec 2015

The petitioners, Vidarbha Taxpayers Association and a citizen, filed a Public Interest Litigation challenging the constitutional validity of the Mahar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Suit for Specific Performance and Injunction Against Cooperative Housing Society and Members — No Agreement of Sale Established, Suit Barred by Limitation. The court held that the plaintiff failed to prove any valid agreement for sale of flats, and the suit was time-barred under Article 54 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

10 Nov 2014

The plaintiff, Vardhaman Developers Limited, filed a suit for specific performance of an alleged oral agreement for sale of flats in a cooperative hou...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Retrospective Property Tax Assessment — Suppression of Exemption Order Justifies Reopening Under Section 134(3) of City of Nagpur Corporation Act, 1948. Appeal Under Section 130 Barred by Limitation as Delay Not Explained.

3 Apr 2013

The case involves a civil revision application filed by Bestech Hospitality Pvt. Ltd. and others (applicants) challenging an order dated 14-12-2011 pa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging State Government's Direction on Non-Occupancy Charges Under Section 79A of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. The Court Held That Directions Issued Under Section 79A Are Binding on Cooperative Housing Societies and Cannot Be Challenged as Prejudicial to Society's Interest.

5 Oct 2011

The petitioners, Matru Ashish Cooperative Housing Society Ltd. and its member Shashikant R. Doshi, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 1s...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)