Search Results for "Bonafide Purchaser"

320 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 320 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Petition Challenging Cancellation of Revenue Entry — Petitioner's Name to Continue in Revenue Records. Revisional Authority Failed to Consider Bona Fide Purchase Under Gujarat Land Revenue Code, 1879.

The petitioner, Sintex Power Limited, purchased agricultural land in Village Lunsapur, Taluka Jafrabad, District Amreli, Gujarat, comprising Survey No...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Upholds Concurrent Findings on Readiness and Willingness. Agreement of Sale with Possession and Part Payment Enforced Against Subsequent Purchaser Under Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The second appeal arises from a suit for specific performance of a sale agreement dated 15.7.1987 between the plaintiff (first respondent) and the fir...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Discretion to Grant Relief Upheld. Courts below correctly exercised discretion to decree specific performance of agreement to sell agricultural land based on credible evidence of payment and readiness.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the original defendant (appellants) against the judgment and decree passed in First Appeal No. 260/2014 by ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute Over Legal Necessity Issue. Failure to Frame Issue on Legal Necessity Does Not Vitiate Trial When Parties Had Opportunity to Lead Evidence.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the plaintiffs (appellants) against the judgment of the First Appellate Court which confirmed the trial cou...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Case — High Court Erred in Reversing Concurrent Findings on Bona Fide Purchaser Defence. Transfer of Property Act, 1882 Sections 41 and 52 interpreted; lis pendens applies to transfers during pendency of injunction suit.

The appeal arises from a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell dated 10.11.2002 for 16 kanals of land for Rs. 8 lakhs, with Rs. 2.50 l...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Temporary Injunction in Favor of Plaintiff in Suit for Declaration of Title and Possession. The court found that the plaintiff had made out a prima facie case and that the balance of convenience was in his favor, restraining the bank from evicting him pending suit.

The appeal arises from a suit filed by the respondent No.1 (original plaintiff) against the appellant (original defendant No.1) and respondent Nos.2 a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Land Acquisition Reference, Enhances Compensation for Acquired Land Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Court Determined Market Value Based on Comparable Sale Instances and Potential for Development, Rejecting Government's Valuation Method.

The case is a land acquisition reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, arising from the acquisition of land belonging to Godrej ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeals in Land Dispute Case — Concurrent Findings Set Aside Due to Non-Application of Mind by First Appellate Court. The Court Held That the First Appellate Court Must Comply with Order 41 Rule 31 CPC and Decide the Appeal on Merits After Proper Appreciation of Evidence.

The present second appeals arise from a land dispute between the appellants (original plaintiffs) and the respondents (original defendants) concerning...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed. Court held that no substantial question of law arose for interference under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

The case is a second appeal arising from a suit for partition and separate possession filed by the original plaintiffs (respondents) against the origi...