Search Results for "Bombay High Court guidelines"

3006 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3006 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Accused No.1's Bail Appeal in Malegaon Bombing Case Charging Conspiracy and Terror Offences. Appeal Questions Special Court's Rejection of Bail Application Pursuant to Supreme Court Direction to Exclude MCOC Act Provisions.

The judgment under consideration arises from a criminal appeal filed by Accused No.1 against the Special Court's order rejecting her bail application ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Resurrects Issue of Mandatory Naval NOC in Development Near Defence Establishments. The Court Examines Validity of Stop Work Notice and Deemed Commencement Certificate Under DCPR 2034, Citing Precedents and Regulatory Vacuum.

The writ petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the stop work notice dated 24 October 2025 issued by MHADA and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs MCGM to Consider New Building Proposal Application Under Section 44 of MRTP Act on Merits. The court held that each application must be decided independently and the MCGM cannot refuse to consider a fresh application based on earlier rejections.

The petitioners, Kaalkaa Real Estates Private Limited and its director Kanta Ramchandra Rane, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitut...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Admit Second Appeals Challenging First Appellate Court's Reversal of Money Decree. Substantial Questions of Law Framed on Whether First Appellate Court Properly Considered Trial Court Findings and Whether Its Findings Were Perverse.

The appellants filed a summary suit for recovery of Rs. 74,37,500 against the respondent based on a memorandum of understanding executed on 01.01.2011...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1659 OF 2005

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Deputy Registrars Challenging Recovery of Excess Salary Due to Mistaken Pay Rule Interpretation. Court holds that recovery of excess payments made without employee fault violates Article 300A of the Constitution and principles of equity.

The petitioners, eight former and current Deputy Registrars of the Bombay High Court, filed a writ petition challenging the decision of the Registrar ...