Search Results for "Bombay Agricultural Produce Market Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Bombay Agricultural Produce Market Act"

306 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 306 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Cancellation of Stall Licence Under APMC Act — Violation of Natural Justice. Joint Director's Order Set Aside for Lack of Notice and Hearing Before Cancellation of Licence Under Section 52B of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963.

24 Mar 2023

The petitioner, Ravindra Arvind Bande, filed two writ petitions under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging a common order dated 14 Jan...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Partly Allows CIDCO's Appeal and Dismisses Claimants' Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Market Value Determined at Rs. 1,50,000/- per Hectare Based on Sale Deed of Similar Land. The court reduced the compensation from Rs. 2,00,000/- to Rs. 1,50,000/- per hectare, applying a 20% deduction for development charges, and upheld the claimants' entitlement to statutory benefits under Sections 23 and 24 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

26 Feb 2020

The case involves two cross-appeals arising from a land acquisition proceeding. The appellant in First Appeal No. 5206 of 2017 is the Administrator of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Election of Agriculture Produce Market Committee Due to Non-Compliance with Reservation Rules. Court holds that failure to provide reservation for Scheduled Tribes in the office of Chairperson as per Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963 and Rules renders the election process invalid.

6 May 2019

The petitioners, eleven agriculturists from Bhandara district, filed a writ petition challenging the election of the Agriculture Produce Market Commit...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds ITAT Order in Favor of APMC in Income Tax Exemption Case — Market Committee Entitled to Exemption Under Section 10(29) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Income from letting out shops and godowns for marketing of agricultural produce is exempt as it is incidental to the committee's statutory functions.

19 Jun 2018

The case involves two appeals filed by the Revenue (Commissioner of Income Tax and others) against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITA...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Market Area Notifications Under Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing Act, 1963 — Petitioners' Challenge Barred by Res Judicata and Delay. Notifications dated 24-2-1995 and 17-4-1998 declaring Jadhavwadi as principal market area upheld as petitioners failed to show any legal infirmity and were bound by earlier decisions in WP 2145/2004 and WP 7123/2005.

23 Jun 2017

The petitioners, four individuals from Aurangabad, filed a writ petition in 2006 challenging two notifications issued by the respondents: one dated 24...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Bifurcation of Agricultural Produce Market Committee for Non-Compliance with Section 6 of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1963. Notification Set Aside as Procedure Including Consultation with Market Committee and Consideration of Objections Was Not Followed.

23 Mar 2016

The petitioner, Shri Namdev Bhagwanrao Ghule, challenged the notification dated 01.12.2015 issued by the State of Maharashtra bifurcating the Agricult...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Deemed License Under Section 7(1) of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963 — Quashes Seizure Notice for Failure to Consider Application Within 30 Days. The Court held that the petitioner is deemed to have secured a license when the Market Committee failed to decide the application within 30 days, and the seizure notice was illegal.

27 Apr 2012

The petitioner, Shree Shyambaba Cotton Company, through its proprietor Anil Vallabhdas Kakani, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Nag...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Labour Court Award Under Section 33-C(2) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Relationship of Employer and Employee Established Between Market Committee and Licensed Weighman.

5 Jan 2010

The Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Solapur, and its Chairman filed a writ petition challenging a Labour Court award dated 29 November 1997, wh...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Constitutional Validity of Maharashtra Act XI of 2003 Amending the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1963. The Court Held That the Amendment Disenfranchising Certain Elected Members of Market Committees Was Within Legislative Competence and Did Not Violate Articles 14 or 19(1)(c) of the Constitution.

13 Feb 2006

The Bombay High Court, by a common judgment, dismissed two writ petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Maharashtra Act XI of 2003, w...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Levy of Market Fee on Cardamom by Agricultural Produce Market Committee — Cardamom Held to be Plantation Crop Not Agricultural Produce Under Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Market (Regulation) Act, 1963. The court held that the Spices Board Act, 1986 (Central Act) prevails over the State Act and cardamom cannot be subjected to market fee.

23 Jun 2005

The petitioner, M/s. Mohanlal Keshavlal & Co., a wholesale trader in cardamom, filed a writ petition challenging the levy of market fee by the Agricul...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)