Search Results for "Assistant Commissioner order"

5434 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5434 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Pronounces Order in Writ Petitions Challenging Premature Transfers of Commercial Tax Officers Under Transfer Guidelines 2013. Transfer Orders Allegedly Violated Minimum Tenure Rule and Requirement of Prior Approval of Chief Minister.

The Karnataka High Court heard a batch of five writ petitions filed by commercial tax officers (Deputy Commissioners and Assistant Commissioners of Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Unexplained Delay in Execution. The Court Held That a 19-Day Gap Between Passing and Service of Detention Order Without Explanation Violates the Detenu's Right to Make a Representation Under Article 22(5) of the Constitution.

The petitioner, Vishnu @ Bablu Vasant Gawali, was detained under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug-Of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Interprets 'Filed' in ITO Order as Termination of Proceedings Under Section 34 of Income-tax Act, 1922. The Order That a Case is 'Filed' Disposes of the Proceeding, Rendering Fresh Notice for Reassessment Valid.

The case arose from reassessment proceedings under the Income-tax Act, 1922. The Additional Income-tax Officer issued a notice under Section 34 and, a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case Regarding Deductions Under Sections 36(1)(vii) and 36(1)(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Tribunal's order setting aside Commissioner's revision under Section 263 upheld as Assessing Officer had made proper inquiries and formed an opinion.

The appeal was filed by the Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-14, Mumbai (appellant-revenue) under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Municipal Commissioner's Order on Building Proposal Validity — Held That Commissioner's Decision Under Section 351 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 Is Final and Not Subject to Judicial Review on Merits.

The petitioner, M/s Mahendra Builders, a partnership firm, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA for Non-Application of Mind and Non-Supply of Vital Documents. Detenu's Right to Make Effective Representation Under Article 22(5) of Constitution Violated as Statements of Co-Accused Not Furnished.

The petitioner, brother-in-law of the detenu Burhan Fakhruddin Khatumdi, challenged a detention order dated 27.3.2015 passed by the Principal Secretar...