Search Results for "Asset Recovery"

483 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 483 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Bank's Writ Petition, Directs Execution of Section 14 SARFAESI Order Despite Pending Civil Suit. Executive Magistrate Cannot Refuse Possession on Ground of Civil Suit; Role Under Section 14 is Ministerial.

The Petitioner, Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited, a banking company, had sanctioned a housing loan to Dipak Digambar Naik and Aruna Naik (co-borrowers) in ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Bank's Appeal Against Confiscation Orders Under Central Excise Act and SARFAESI Act. Commissioner's Use of Omitted Rule 173Q(2) Invalid and SARFAESI Act Grants Priority to Secured Creditors Over Excise Dues.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Allahabad High Court dismissing a writ petition filed by Punjab National Bank. The bank had extended credit fa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds NCLAT Decision on Limitation in Insolvency Petition Initiated by Financial Creditor. Application Under Section 7 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Held Within Limitation After Excluding Time Spent in SARFAESI Proceedings Under Section 14(2) of Limitation Act, 1963.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) dismissing an appeal against an order of the National Company ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds DRAT Order Requiring 25% Pre-deposit for Waiver of Appeal Under SARFAESI Act. Legal Heirs of Guarantor Must Deposit 25% of Section 13(2) Notice Amount as Condition for Hearing Appeal on Merits.

The petitioners, Smt. Julie Amitabh Parekh and others, who are the legal heirs of the deceased guarantor Amitabh Arun Parekh, filed a writ petition ch...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Winding Up of S. Kumars Nationwide Ltd. for Inability to Pay Debts. Multiple financial creditors and operational creditors successfully proved the company's insolvency under Sections 433(e) and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956.

The judgment concerns a batch of company petitions filed by various financial creditors and operational creditors seeking the winding up of S. Kumars ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Dismissal of Complaint Under Section 203 CrPC — No Sufficient Grounds for Process Found After Police Investigation Under Section 202 CrPC.

The petitioner, Milind Kashinath Mahadik, filed a complaint in the Court of Judicial Magistrate First Class at Pune against respondent nos. 2, 3, and ...