Search Results for "Article 368"

177 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 177 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Judgments on Creamy Layer Determination for OBC Reservation in Civil Services. Inclusion of Salary Income for PSU Employees Under Category II(C) of Office Memorandum Dated 08.09.1993 Found Discriminatory and Set Aside Due to Violation of Article 14.

The Supreme Court dealt with three consolidated civil appeals arising from separate High Court judgments concerning the determination of creamy layer ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition as Barred by Delay and Laches in Project Affected Person Employment Case. Claim for Reinstatement Rejected After 27-Year Delay from Denial Letters.

The petitioner, Shri Uday Laxman Pawar, claiming to be a Project Affected Person (PAP), filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds State Legislation on Gurdwara Management Under Entry 32 of List II. Haryana Sikh Gurdwara (Management) Act, 2014 Found Constitutionally Valid as It Pertains to Management of Religious Institutions Within State Legislative Competence.

The dispute arose from the enactment of the Haryana Sikh Gurdwara (Management) Act, 2014 by the State of Haryana, which created a separate juristic en...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petition of Convict in 2012 Delhi Gang Rape Case — Death Penalty Upheld. Review Petition Rejected as No Error Apparent on Face of Record; Grounds Identical to Those of Co-Accused Already Dismissed.

The Supreme Court dismissed a review petition filed by Akshay Kumar Singh, the cleaner of the bus involved in the infamous 2012 Delhi gang rape and mu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Age Limit and Recruitment Interval Rules for Uttar Pradesh Higher Judicial Service. Rules 8(1) and 12 of UPHJS Rules, 1975 Held Valid as Not Manifestly Arbitrary Under Articles 14 and 16.

The Supreme Court considered the constitutional validity of Rules 8(1) and 12 of the Uttar Pradesh Higher Judicial Service Rules, 1975. The petitioner...