High Court of Karnataka Writ Petition (PIL) – Cause Title Only. No substantive judgment text provided.
21 Jun 2016...
Search Results for "Article 19(1)"
597 result(s) found
Found 597 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Contempt Petition Alleging Non-Compliance with Criminal Antecedent Disclosure Directions in Bihar Legislative Assembly Elections. Election Commission's Report Showed Substantial Compliance by Political Parties with Supreme Court's Mandate Under Articles 129 and 142 of Constitution of India.
10 Aug 2021The Supreme Court considered a contempt petition filed by an advocate alleging willful disobedience of the court's directions regarding disclosure of ...
- 294
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Compulsory Service Bonds for Post-Graduate Medical Courses. The Court held that such bonds are valid and do not violate fundamental rights under Articles 14, 19, and 21 of the Constitution, as they are reasonable restrictions imposed in public interest to ensure availability of doctors in underserved areas.
19 Aug 2019The case involves multiple writ petitions and appeals challenging compulsory bond conditions imposed by various State Governments and the Armed Forces...
- 460
High Court
Karnataka High Court Pronounces Order on Constitutional Challenge to Karnataka On-demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016. Petitioners Assert Rules Ultra Vires Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Violative of Freedom of Trade and Commerce Under Articles 14, 19(1)(g), and 301 of the Constitution.
10 Nov 2016The Karnataka High Court considered a batch of writ petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Karnataka On-demand Transportation Techno...
- 55
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to Denial of Exemption for Transitional Product Specific Safeguard Duty under Section 8C of Customs Tariff Act, 1975. Petitioner Asserts Notification No.96/2009-Cus. Intended to Exempt All Safeguard Duties and Phrase 'under section 8B' is Discriminatory.
23 Dec 2015The petitioner, a public limited company manufacturing pneumatic tyres, regularly imported Carbon Black from the People’s Republic of China. Carbon ...
- 16
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR Against Journalist for Alleged Hate Speech Under Sections 153A and 505 IPC — Tweet Criticizing Budget Allocation Not Constituting Promotion of Enmity Between Groups. Court held that criticism of government policy is protected speech under Article 19(1)(a) and does not attract penal provisions unless it incites violence or promotes enmity between groups.
17 Mar 2025The petitioner, Rahul Sivasankar, a renowned journalist with over 25 years of experience, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of C...
- 24
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Addresses Challenge to National Eligibility-cum-Entrance Test (NEET) Notifications for Medical Admissions. The court examines the regulatory power of medical councils and the impact on minority educational institutions under Articles 19(1)(g) and 30 of the Constitution.
1 Aug 2026The Supreme Court of India heard a batch of writ petitions and transferred cases challenging four notifications issued by the Medical Council of India...
- 72
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition, Holds Labour Court is a 'Court' Under Section 195(1)(b) CrPC for Making Complaint of False Evidence. Labour Court's Rejection of Section 340 Application Set Aside as Labour Court Has Jurisdiction to Entertain Complaint for False Statement in Written Statement.
8 Aug 2018The writ petition challenged an order of the Labour Court rejecting an application under Section 340 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) fo...
- 123
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Restores POCSO and IT Act Charges in Child Pornography Case — High Court Erred in Quashing Chargesheet Without Considering Presumption of Culpable Mental State. Possession of Child Pornographic Material, Even Without Intent to Distribute, Constitutes an Offence Under Section 15(1) of POCSO and Section 67B of IT Act.
23 Sep 2024The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by Just Rights for Children Alliance and another child rights organization against the judgment of the Mad...
- 1294
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Section 24(6-A) CrPC Allowing Appointment of Private Advocates as Public Prosecutors in High Court — Provision Not Arbitrary or Discriminatory Against Government Prosecutors. The court held that the amendment does not violate Articles 14, 16, or 21 of the Constitution and that the State has the discretion to appoint any advocate for conducting cases in the High Court.
25 Jul 2017The petitioners, the Maharashtra State Public Prosecutors Association and several individual Assistant/Additional Public Prosecutors working in the co...
- 59
