Search Results for "Arbitral Bias Allegation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Arbitral Bias Allegation"

43 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 43 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka hears civil miscellaneous petition seeking termination of existing arbitral tribunal and appointment of independent sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The dispute arises from a works contract where the contractor sought replacement of the arbitrator appointed by the department on grounds of bias and non-compliance with disclosure requirements.

11 Aug 2022

The petitioner, a contractor, was awarded a works contract by the Central Public Works Department (CPWD) for construction of a Sewage Treatment Plant....

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Examines Ineligibility of Retired CPWD Officers as Arbitrators under Section 12(5) of Arbitration Act. Appointment of Retired Additional Director General of CPWD as Arbitrator Without Contractor's Consent Violates Seventh Schedule and Mandates Express Agreement Post-Dispute.

19 Sep 2019

The petitioner, a construction company, entered into six separate agreements with the Central Public Works Department (CPWD) for various construction ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Disposes Four Civil Miscellaneous Petitions Filed Under Sections 11(6) and 12 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Seeking Appointment of Substitute Arbitrator. Petitioners Contended That Arbitrators Appointed by CPWD Were Ineligible Under Section 12(5) for Want of Mandatory Consent.

19 Sep 2019

The petitioners, M/s. Sri Krishna Shelters Pvt. Ltd., were awarded six construction contracts by the Central Public Works Department (CPWD) for works ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Arbitration Appointment Dispute — ICA's Substitution of State's Nominee Arbitrator Held Unjustified. Section 15(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Requires Substitute Arbitrator to Be Appointed Per Original Procedure; Former Employee Not Disqualified Per Se.

3 Jan 2019

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the Government of Haryana against the order of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, which had dismissed th...

High Court

High Court Allows Petition Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for Appointment of Arbitrator in Construction Contract Dispute. Court Appoints Sole Arbitrator to Adjudicate Disputes Arising from Contract Dated 27.09.2013.

8 Dec 2017

The petitioner, Sobha Projects and Trade Private Limited, filed a petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Ex-Parte Arbitral Award Due to Lack of Proper Notice and Violation of Natural Justice — Leave and Licence Agreement Dispute. The court held that the arbitrator failed to ensure proper service of notice on the petitioner, thereby denying it a fair opportunity to present its case under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

29 Jul 2016

The judgment concerns two arbitration petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an ex-parte arbitral...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Bidder Qualification in Tender Process — Debarment by One State Does Not Automatically Disqualify in Another State's Tender Without Specific Clause in Tender Document.

27 Jun 2016

The Petitioner, Smart Chip Pvt. Ltd., filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the decision of Respondent Nos....

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Loan Dispute — Petitioner's Challenge Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Rejected. Court Held That Arbitrator's Findings on Default and Foreclosure Were Not Patently Illegal or Against Public Policy.

20 Apr 2016

The petitioner, M/s. Sea Eagle Dredging Marine Infrastructure Private Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation A...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Restoring Arbitral Award in Shareholder Dispute. Court Holds That Single Judge Exceeded Jurisdiction Under Section 34 by Reappreciating Evidence and Substituting His Own View.

13 Mar 2013

The case involves two appeals under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by M/s. Goldstar Metal Solutions Pvt. Ltd. and M/s...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Railway Contract Dispute. Court upholds arbitrator's rejection of claim for extension of lease, finding no error of law or jurisdiction under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

8 Oct 2012

The petitioner, Prajapati Gunvant Keshavlal, was engaged in loading and unloading goods from railway wagons. On 11th June 2009, the respondent, Union ...

2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)