Search Results for "Admissibility"

84 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 84 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Death Penalty Convict on Grounds of Procedural Irregularities and Lack of Fair Legal Representation "Justice demands fairness: procedural lapses lead to acquittal in a grave case."

1. Factual Background Incident: A 10-year-old victim was raped and murdered on May 27, 2009, at a tubewell cabin operated by the appellant, Ashok. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Acquittal on Grounds of Lack of Conclusive Circumstantial Evidence" "When suspicion remains, conviction cannot stand: the chain of circumstantial evidence must be complete and unbroken."

1. Factual Background Incident Date: February 2, 1997. Victim's Death: Due to head injuries caused by blunt and sharp-edged weapons. Discov...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bail Granted in NDPS Case Due to Prolonged Incarceration and Lack of Substantial Evidence. "Right to Speedy Trial Overrides Section 37 NDPS Act's Rigors."

The Bombay High Court granted bail to Accused No. 2 in a case involving the seizure of 191.60 kg of heroin under the NDPS Act. The court emphasized th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Acquittal in Brutal Murder Case: Supreme Court Quashes Convictions in Lack of Legally Admissible Evidence. When suspicions fail legal scrutiny, justice demands proof beyond doubt.

The Supreme Court of India overturned the life imprisonment conviction of the appellants for a brutal murder, citing a lack of legally admissible evi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Acquittal in Common Intention: Nagpur Bench Revisits Section 34 IPC in Murder Case" "Clarifying liability under Section 34 IPC while affirming individual accountability under Section 302 IPC."

Case Background The appellants, family members (Jayanand, Niranjan, Ashabai, and Kiran Dhabale), were convicted under Section 302 r/w 34 IPC and Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Admissibility of Counter-claims and Jurisdiction: High Court Quashes Trial Court Order" "Upholding jurisdictional boundaries and procedural precision in civil litigation."

1. Background of the Case: Petitioner: Filed a suit for specific performance of contract. Respondent: Filed a counter-claim asserting possession a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Partition Dispute Judgment: Unregistered Partition Deed Not Subject to Stamp Duty and Penalty Requirement. The Bombay High Court held that an unregistered partition deed recording a family arrangement does not require impounding for stamp duty or registration, and ordered a refund of penalties.

The High Court in this Writ Petition addressed the legality of an order by the trial Court that sent an unregistered partition deed to the Collector o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Union of India’s Appeal Dismissed in Motor Accident Compensation Case. Court affirms the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal’s award of compensation, holding the Union of India accountable for the vehicle driver’s negligence despite procedural contentions.

The Union of India filed an appeal challenging an order of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, which directed compensation for injuries sustained in a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court of India overturns High Court's decision; Upholds Conviction Based on Admitted Documents. Case remanded by the Allahabad High Court, reversed by the Supreme Court based on the correctness of Section 294 CrPC application in relation to documentary evidence.

  1. Case Background (Para 2-3): The case arises from the brutal murder of two individuals from a Scheduled Caste, Mohan Ram and Bodha Devi, on t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"High Court Upholds Conviction in Heinous Gang Rape Case: Admissibility of Electronic Evidence Challenged" "Bombay High Court affirms the life imprisonment of two accused, focusing on electronic evidence and delay in the victim’s report."

1. Introduction and Case Background: Facts: The appellants were convicted for gang rape under Sections 376(2)(g), 366A, 292, 500, and 506 (II) of t...