Search Results for "Additional Tahsildar office"

860 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 860 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Aurangabad Hears Letters Patent Appeal Against Dismissal of Review in Kulkarni Watan Land Regrant Case. Decides on Rights of Purchaser Versus Successors of Original Watandar Under Bombay Paragana and Kulkarni Watans (Abolition) Act, 1950.

The dispute involved lands bearing Survey Nos. 135 and 144 at Jamda, Jalgaon, originally held as Kulkarni Watan. In 1944, the vendor Ramchandra Tembul...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Tribunal Order in Service Matter — Seniority and Promotion Dispute Among Tahsildars. Court holds that the Karnataka State Administrative Tribunal's interim order directing status quo regarding seniority and promotion of Tahsildars was justified pending final adjudication.

The case involves two writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging a common order dated 22.10.2019 passed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Directs Removal of Encroachments for Sewage Tunnel Construction Under Government Scheme. Petitioner Sought Mandamus to Remove Encroachments from Specified Survey Numbers; Court Ordered Identification and Removal Within 12 Weeks Following Statutory Procedure.

The petitioner, K. Selvi Raja, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus directing the responden...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

SECOND APPEAL NO.538 2005

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes Tahsildar Order in Land Dispute Involving Archak Family of Kolluru Mookambika Temple — Lack of Notice and Violation of Natural Justice. Order under Section 136(3) of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 set aside as petitioners were not heard before eviction.

The petitioners, K N Parameshwara Adiga and Kalidasa Bhat, residents of Kolluru village and belonging to the Archak family of Sri Kolluru Mookambika t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Disqualification of Sarpanch in Bombay Village Panchayat Act Case Due to Husband's Encroachment on Government Land. Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India.

The petitioner, Sau. Savitabai Sanjay Meshram, was elected as Sarpanch of Grampanchayat Ashtgaon in 2007 on a seat reserved for Scheduled Caste woman....