Search Results for "17-B wages"

54 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 54 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows State's Appeal Against Labour Court Award Directing Backwages for Period Workmen Were Not in Service — Workmen Not Entitled to Wages for Period They Did Not Work Despite Reinstatement Order.

The case involves a Letters Patent Appeal filed by the State of Gujarat against an order of a learned Single Judge directing the State to pay wages to...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Labour Court Award of Reinstatement with Backwages for Workman in Private Unaided School Dispute. School's Challenge Dismissed as Termination Found Illegal for Non-Compliance with Section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The Petitioner, M/s. Navy Children School Secondary, a private unaided school established from the Welfare Fund of Defence Personnel, challenged the A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Writ Petition Challenging Labour Court Award Granting Continuity of Service to Intermittent Daily Wage Worker. Labour Court's Discretion Under Section 11A of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Upheld as No Perversity Found.

The State of Maharashtra filed a writ petition challenging the judgment and award dated 27/06/1997 of the Labour Court in Reference (IDA) No. 25/1988,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Workman's Petition Challenging Industrial Court's Order Dismissing Complaint for Non-Implementation of Award. Delay of 4½ years in filing complaint under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971 held fatal as no sufficient cause shown.

The petitioner, Kashinath Parvati Labade, was a workman employed with the Department of Social Forestry, Maharashtra. He was allegedly illegally termi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Air India, Upholds Dismissal of Air Hostess for Unauthorized Absence After Maternity Leave. The court held that the Industrial Tribunal's order of reinstatement was perverse and that the employer's decision to dismiss was justified under the Model Standing Orders.

The litigation between Air India Limited (appellant) and Ms. Shashikala Jatav (respondent) has been ongoing for two decades. The respondent was employ...