KAHC030005792015_1
24 Apr 2020The judgment relates to a conglomeration of appeals and cross-objections arising out of land acquisition proceedings initiated by the State of Karnata...
Search Results for "urban land"
1826 result(s) found
Found 1826 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Injunction Against Developer in Dispute Over Exhausted FSI and Conveyance Rights. Prima Facie, Developer's Attempt to Use TDR for Further Construction on Sector IV-A After Exhausting Consumable FSI Violates Cooperative Housing Societies' Right to Conveyance.
15 Apr 2015The Bombay High Court dealt with cross-appeals arising from an interim injunction granted in a suit filed by cooperative housing societies against the...
- 31
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Amendment in Arbitration Application Under Section 9 of Arbitration Act — Petitioner Permitted to Amend Pleadings to Include Claim for Injunction Against Alienation of Partnership Property. Amendment under Order VI Rule 17 CPC allowed as it did not change nature of proceedings and was necessary to avoid multiplicity of litigation.
25 Nov 2014The petitioner, Sanjay Suganchand Kasliwal, filed a writ petition challenging the rejection of his applications for amendment (Exh.35 and Exh.36) in a...
- 119
High Court
- 85
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Partly Allows Appeal by Development Authority in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Market Value Reduced from Rs.1,50,000 to Rs.1,20,000 per Acre. Comparable Sale Deed Method Upheld but Deduction for Development Reduced from 40% to 20% Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
1 Apr 2019The case involves an appeal by the Bijapur Urban Development Authority (BUDA) against the judgment of the II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Bijapur, i...
- 75
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute, Upholds High Court's Determination of Market Value. The Court affirmed that compensation under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 must be based on market value at the time of notification, rejecting the cumulative increase method and standardizing compensation for similar lands acquired for the same public purpose.
8 Apr 2021The dispute arose from the acquisition of lands in Haryana for setting up an Industrial Model Township, Phase-VI, Manesar, Gurgaon, under the Land Acq...
- 578
High Court
Bombay High Court Reconsiders Promoter's Right to Additional Construction Under MOFA After Supreme Court Remand. Dispute Centers on Whether Section 7A Overrides Flat Purchasers' Consent Requirement for Additional Wings in an Existing Scheme.
7 Oct 2010The Bombay High Court heard two first appeals remanded by the Supreme Court in a dispute between Madhuvihar Cooperative Housing Society (the society) ...
- 32
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Lease of Land to Islamic Welfare Association for Mosque Construction — Petitioner Lacked Bonafides and Suppressed Material Facts. The court held that the petition was not maintainable as a Public Interest Litigation due to lack of bonafides and ulterior motives.
7 Apr 2010The petitioner, Mr. Sumitra Krishna Kadu, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before the Bombay High Court challenging the lease of a plot of lan...
- 45
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Endorsement Denying Building License in Land Use Conversion Dispute — Mandamus Issued to Reconsider Application. Conversion of land from agricultural to non-agricultural use under Section 95 of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 does not automatically entitle an applicant to a building license under the Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976, but the authority must consider the application on merits without imposing extraneous conditions.
26 Oct 2023The petitioner, Mrs. Sunanda Narasegowda, owned a property in Mysuru that was originally agricultural land. She obtained conversion of the land to non...
- 159
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Cancellation of Tender for Textile Mill Land Sale. Petitioner failed to demonstrate any legal right to compel conclusion of sale after tender was cancelled due to non-compliance with terms.
25 Jan 2021The petitioner, M/s Drushti Engineers & Developers, a partnership firm, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India ...
- 77
