Search Results for "spot inspection"

417 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 417 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR Against BESCOM Engineers in Negligence Case — Lack of Prima Facie Evidence of Rash or Negligent Act. Section 304A IPC requires proof of gross negligence directly causing death, not mere failure of duty.

The petitioners, Sri Sreeramu V. and Subramanya T., who are Executive Engineer and Assistant Executive Engineer respectively at BESCOM's Whitefield Di...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings in SC/ST Act Case Due to Lack of Sanction and Absence of Public View Element. Allegations of Caste-Based Insult Under Section 3(1)(v) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 Failed as Incident Occurred in Private Setting, Not in Public View.

The petitioners, Mallikarjun, Sharana @ Sharanappa, and Nandappa, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings in SC/ST Act Case Due to Lack of Sanction and Absence of Public View Element. Allegations of Caste-Based Insult Under Section 3(1)(v) of SC/ST Act Fail as Incident Occurred in Private Setting, Not in Public View.

The petitioners, Mallikarjun, Sharana @ Sharanappa, and Nandappa, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in Rash Driving Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Absence of Credible Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 279, 337, 304A IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The revision petitioner, Satish Ganapati Gunagi, was convicted by the JMFC, Ankola in C.C. No. 62/2007 for offences under Sections 279 (rash driving),...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in POCSO and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376 IPC and Section 4 of POCSO Act, 2012 set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, G S Venkatesh, was convicted by the I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Chikkaballapur, in Special S.C. No.12/2016 for offences p...