Search Results for "single transaction rule"

1694 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1694 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions by Petitioners Challenging Competent Authority's Orders Under Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 -- Petitioners Fail to Establish Jurisdictional Error or Violation of Natural Justice

The judgment involves four connected writ petitions filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay challenging orders passed by the Competent Aut...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Admission of Winding-Up Petitions Under Companies Act, 1956 — Held That Company Court Has Discretion to Appoint Provisional Liquidator and That Appeal Against Admission Order Is Not Maintainable Under Section 483 of the Companies Act, 1956.

The judgment concerns a batch of appeals filed by Vision Millennium Exports Pvt. Ltd. against orders of the Company Court admitting winding-up petitio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed. Agreement for Sale Contained Contradictory Clauses Regarding Time for Performance, and Plaintiff Failed to Prove Readiness and Willingness.

The appellant (plaintiff) filed a Second Appeal against the concurrent dismissal of his suit for specific performance of an agreement for sale of a pl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Originating Summons Regarding Interpretation of Will and Executor’s Discretion. Questions Raised Include Validity of Purchase of Bungalow Instead of Flat and Nature of Bequeath to Plaintiff and Granddaughter Under Clauses 15, 6, 7, etc.

The present originating summons arose from disputes concerning the last will and testament of Mrs. Pillo M. Ghaswala, who died on 7 October 1989. The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Passed Judgment in Appeals Filed Under Section 54(1) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The Court Considered Challenges by State and Landowners Against Reference Court's Compensation Determination for Lands Acquired for Minor Irrigation Tank.

The case involves multiple appeals and cross-objections filed under Section 54(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and Order 41 Rule 22 of the Code ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Criminal Writ Petition Challenging Sessions Court's Revision Order Against Issuance of Process. Order of Issuance of Process Under Section 204 CrPC is Interlocutory and Not Revisable Under Section 397(2) CrPC.

The petitioner, Sharad Vasant Sawant, filed a complaint under Sections 406 and 420 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 against respondent nos....