Search Results for "rule 10(2)"

2157 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2157 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Batch of Petitions Challenging APMC Nagpur Election Process and Government Orders Extending Board Tenure

The judgment pertains to multiple writ petitions and a contempt petition concerning the elections and administration of the Agricultural Produce Marke...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Examines Whether Appeal is Barred by Res Judicata and Abatement in Suit for Specific Performance; Court Notes that Plaintiffs Did Not Appeal Decree in Companion Suit and Failed to Bring All Legal Heirs On Record.

The appeal arises from the judgment and decree dated 18.03.2000 passed by the trial court in Special Civil Suit No. 176 of 1991 and Regular Civil Suit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Reviews Its Own Judgment That Struck Down Ex Post Facto Environmental Clearance Notifications Under Environment (Protection) Act. Review Petition Seeks Recall Citing Overlooked Binding Precedents.

Background: The present matter is a review petition arising from the Supreme Court's judgment in Vanashakti v. Union of India, dated 16 May 2025, whic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal and Enhances Motor Accident Compensation Under Order XLI Rule 33 CPC. Death Caused Due to Strangulation by Tractor Machinery; Court Holds Accident Proven and Awards Just Compensation.

The appeal was filed by New India Assurance Company Limited against the judgment and award dated 02.01.2012 passed by the Principal Senior Civil Judge...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Considers Validity of Transit Fee Levy on Forest Produce Under Section 41 of Indian Forest Act, 1927. High Court Judgments on Transit Fee Rules Challenged in Batch of Appeals from Uttarakhand, Uttar Pradesh, and Madhya Pradesh.

This batch of cases before the Supreme Court arose from multiple writ petitions challenging the levy of transit fee on forest produce imposed by the S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Adjudicates Batch of Appeals Involving Transit Fee Levied by Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand and Madhya Pradesh Under Indian Forest Act, 1927. Appeals Arise from Differing High Court Decisions on Validity of Transit Rules Framed Under Section 41.

The Supreme Court addressed a batch of cases concerning the levy of transit fee on forest produce. The matter involved three States: Uttar Pradesh, Ut...