High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Writ Petition Filed by Cooperative Housing Societies. Petitioners Challenge Orders of Cooperative Authorities Allegedly Favoring Developer.
9 May 2025...
Search Results for "revision under Article 227"
1330 result(s) found
Found 1330 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to Deemed Conveyance in Favor of Cooperative Housing Society — Additional FSI Rights Not a Bar to Conveyance Under MOFA. The Court held that the Competent Authority has jurisdiction to entertain a second application for deemed conveyance after rejection of the first, and the developer's claim over additional FSI does not prevent conveyance of land to the society.
17 Jul 2026The Petitioner, Ariisto Realtors Private Limited, a developer, challenged an order dated 14 July 2025 passed by the District Deputy Registrar, Co-oper...
- 220
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Senior Sales Executive Challenging Termination — Holds He Is Not an 'Employee' Under MRTU & PULP Act. The court affirmed that the petitioner's supervisory and managerial role excluded him from the definition of employee under Section 3(5) of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions & Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971.
26 Apr 2024The petitioner, Mr. Jobi Joseph, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 1 April 2014 passed ...
- 42
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Maintenance to Second Wife in Section 125 CrPC Case Despite Void Marriage Due to Husband's Deception. Husband Cannot Deny Maintenance on Ground of Invalidity of Marriage When He Concealed Prior Marriage.
14 Dec 2023The petitioner, Mrs. Alka Bhausaheb Bhad, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the judgment and o...
- 61
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Restoration of Criminal Complaint in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Non-Compliance with Conditional Order. Petitioner's right to prosecute respondent for offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 revived after respondent failed to deposit amount as directed.
4 May 2006The petitioner, Anil Prabhakar Naik, filed a criminal complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 against the respondents for ...
- 52
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Land Acquisition Officer’s Endorsements Denying Compensation for Phot Kharab Lands, Directs Enquiry Under Rule 21(2) of Karnataka Land Revenue Rules, 1966. The Court held that classification as phot kharab does not automatically vest ownership in the State; the Land Acquisition Officer must ascertain whether the land falls under Rule 21(2)(a) or (b) before deciding compensation.
7 Mar 2023Background: The case involved three writ petitions filed by landowners whose lands were acquired for the Upper Krishna Project, challenging the endors...
- 39
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Writ Petition Challenging Mandatory Pre-Deposit Under Section 129E of Customs Act, 1962. Assessee Claims That Requirement to Deposit 7.5% of Duty Demanded, Capped at Rs.10 Crores, Renders Appellate Remedy Illusory and Infringes Fundamental Rights to Trade and Livelihood.
7 Nov 2025The petitioner, an importer of edible oils, challenged the mandatory pre-deposit requirement under Section 129E(ii) of the Customs Act, 1962 before th...
- 25
High Court
Madras High Court Allows Revision Against Rejection of Plaint in Government Suit for Declaration of Nullity of Decree — Trial Court's Order Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Order VII Rule 11 CPC. The court held that a suit challenging a decree as null and void on grounds of fraud or inherent lack of jurisdiction is maintainable and not barred by res judicata.
23 Jan 2026The Government of Tamil Nadu, represented by the District Collector and other revenue officials, filed a civil suit (unnumbered O.S.SR.No.448 of 2022)...
- 138
High Court
High Court of Bombay examines challenge to Industrial Court order that dismissed revision applications against Labour Court’s dismissal of complaints alleging unfair labour practices under Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act. The lower courts held that complaints were not maintainable under Item 1 of Schedule IV, being more appropriately under Item 6, and that termination of services was by efflux of time under contract, not retrenchment requiring compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act.
26 Oct 2016The dispute arose from complaints filed by sixteen women packers employed on temporary basis by a pharmaceutical company since 1985. They alleged that...
- 25
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Stamp Duty Reassessment — Prior Agreement Valuation Binding. Sale Deed Executed in Conformity with Assessed Agreement Cannot Be Reopened Under Section 31A of Indian Stamp Act, 1899 (Goa Amendment).
29 Jan 2024The petitioners, Mr. Sameer Vasudev Morajkar and Mrs. Prithvi B. Dessai, executed a sale deed dated 16.12.2020 in respect of property measuring 1900 s...
- 64
