Search Results for "prior High Court permission"

5101 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5101 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Rehears Criminal Appeals Against Conviction for Murder and Robbery After Remand by Supreme Court. Conviction Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Recoveries Challenged Under Section 374(2) of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

The matter originated from the murder of Smt. Chukibai, a 68-year-old pawnbroker residing alone at Chamarajpet, Bengaluru. On 12.05.1991, accused No.1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Second Appeal in Injunction Suit — Rejection of Plaint Set Aside. Plaint Discloses Cause of Action and Is Not Barred by Limitation Under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC.

The appellant, M/s. Shree Garodi Steels, filed a suit for permanent injunction against the respondent, M/s. Yojaka India Private Ltd., in O.S. No. 739...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petition Seeking Compensation for Illegal Handcuffing and Parading in a Bailable Offence. The Court Deliberates on Police Conduct and Fundamental Rights Under Article 21 in Context of Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The petitioner, a law student, faced five criminal complaints under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, arising from dishonoured cheq...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Hears Petition to Quash Rape Charges Against Advocate Filed by Law Intern. Allegations of Sexual Harassment and Attempt to Rape Under IPC Sections 354 and 376 Examined, with Focus on Distinction Between Preparation and Attempt Under Section 511 IPC.

The case involved a criminal petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 by an advocate, seeking to quash a charge sheet ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Challenge to DRAT Order Upholding DRT Dismissal of Recall of Ex-Parte Decree in Debt Recovery Proceedings. Petitioners Contend Non-Service of Summons and Advocate's Mere Filing of Vakalatnama Cannot Waive Service, Which Is Essential for Written Statement.

The matter before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay arose from writ petitions challenging the judgment of the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal da...