Search Results for "panch witness admission"

879 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 879 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Kidnapping and Rape of Minor Under POCSO Act — Age of Victim Determined by Ossification Test and School Records, Consent Irrelevant for Minor.

The appellant, Sujoy @ Sanjay Laltu Chakravarty, was convicted by the Special Judge, Gondia, in Special POCSO Case No. 11/2014 for offences under Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Prevention of Corruption Act Case Due to Defective Sanction and Probable Defence. Demand for Amount Held to Be Visit Fees and Medicine Expenses, Not Illegal Gratification, Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

This criminal appeal arises from a conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The appellant, a veterinary doctor employed at Panchayat S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Robbery Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 394 and 397 IPC Set Aside as Testimony of Sole Eyewitness Found Unreliable and Medical Evidence Inconsistent.

The case involves two criminal appeals filed by three accused persons convicted under Sections 394 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for robbery ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Credible Witnesses. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Fails as Prosecution Witnesses Turn Hostile and Medical Evidence Does Not Support the Prosecution Case.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment of the Sessions Court acquitting the respondents of offences under Sections 302, 324, 201, 149,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Extra-Judicial Confession and Incomplete Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Ramesh and Mukinda Sabhadinde, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Washim for the murder of their father Ramchandra under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Accused's Appeals, Upholding Conviction in Murder Case Based on Corroborated Eye-Witness Account and Medical Evidence. Conviction Under Sections 302, 201, and 506 IPC Upheld as Prosecution Proved Homicidal Death and Accused's Role in Killing and Destruction of Evidence.

The case arose from an incident on 17 May 2005, where the deceased, Mahadeva @ Nagamadegowda, husband of accused No.1 (Smt. Malathi), was murdered. Ac...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Failure to Prove Motive. Conviction based solely on circumstantial evidence and last seen theory set aside as prosecution failed to establish chain of circumstances.

The appellant, Suresh Narayan Dakhore, was convicted by the Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Washim, for the murder of Laxman Ramkrushna Naik and sent...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Robbery and Attempt to Murder Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 392, 397, 307, 353 IPC set aside as sole reliance on police witnesses and delayed identification parade rendered prosecution case doubtful.

The case involves two appeals filed by original accused No.1 (Sayeed Rashid Shaikh @ Saidu Bangali) and accused No.2 (Amit Ismail Patel @ Ammu Batan) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Kidnapping for Ransom Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Demand for Ransom. Conviction under Section 364-A IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove that the accused made a demand for ransom; conviction under Section 365 IPC upheld for abduction.

The appellant, Mehtab Alam Lalai Choudhari, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, for offences under Section 364-A (kidnappi...