Search Results for "meeting agenda"

400 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 400 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Quashes Compulsory Retirement of Employee in Kadamba Transport Corporation Case — Retirement Held Punitive Without Inquiry. Resolution No. 71 of 2007 Set Aside as Board Failed to Record Satisfaction of Inefficiency Under Service Rules.

The petitioner, Mahesh Prabhakar Kamat, was appointed as Accountant in the Kadamba Transport Corporation Limited on 13 December 1982. He was promoted ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Summons Against Politician in Defamation Case for Alleged Remarks Against RSS — Statements Not Defamatory as They Did Not Refer to Complainant or Any Identifiable Individual.

The petitioner, Rahul Gandhi, a Member of Parliament and Vice President of the Indian National Congress, filed a criminal writ petition under Article ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Discriminatory Tender Conditions in Telecom Infrastructure Bid. Eligibility criteria requiring prior experience in road development and minimum turnover of Rs. 100 crores held arbitrary and violative of Article 14.

The petitioner, High-G Transmissions Pvt. Ltd., a private limited company registered as an Infrastructure Provider under the Indian Telegraph Act, 188...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Appellate Order and Remands GST Refund Case for Fresh Consideration Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Appellate Authority Dismissed Appeal Without Considering Merits or Granting Hearing, Mandating Remand Under Section 107(11) of KGST/CGST Act.

The petitioner, M/S ITD CEMINDIA JV, an association of persons, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses PIL Seeking CBI Investigation into Alleged Irregularities in BEML Limited. Court holds that the petitioner lacked locus standi and the petition was based on unsubstantiated allegations and media reports, not credible material.

The petitioner, Mr. K. Subramanyam Sastry, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before the High Court of Karnataka seeking a direction to the Cent...