High Court of Judicature at Bombay Decides Writ Petition No. 2727 of 2018 Filed by Ruler of Ex-State of Jawahar Against State of Maharashtra and Others — [Details of Subject Matter and Outcome Not Available from Provided Text]
26 May 2025...
Search Results for "legislative history"
812 result(s) found
Found 812 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision Holding Time Keepers as Workers under Factories Act, 1948. The Court Rules That Factual Finding of Nature of Work Being Incidental to Manufacturing Process Is Binding, and the Wide Definition of 'Worker' Covers Clerical Time Keepers.
9 Oct 1969This appeal before the Supreme Court of India concerns the classification of certain employees as 'workers' under the Factories Act, 1948. The respond...
- 69
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Reference on Applicability of Section 482 CrPC to Domestic Violence Proceedings; Conflicting Precedents on Nature of Proceedings Under Section 12(1) of the D.V. Act Lead to Full Bench. Key Question Involves Whether Inherent Powers of High Court Can Quash D.V. Act Applications Given Their Predominantly Civil Character.
3 May 2018The matter came before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, as a reference to a Full Bench to resolve conflicting decisions on whether proceedings und...
- 38
High Court
KAHC010064292023_1
20 Dec 2023The writ petition was filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the report of the District Caste Verification Committe...
- 22
High Court
Bombay High Court Examines Legality of Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission’s Distribution Open Access Regulations. Challenge Concerns Alleged Jurisdictional Overreach Curtailing Consumers’ Right to Access Power Exchange Under the Electricity Act, 2003.
30 Oct 2015The provided text is an incomplete extract of a judgment from the Bombay High Court in a set of writ petitions (WP Nos. 2694/2014, 2318/2014, 2294/201...
- 26
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Will in Testamentary Suit and Examines Constitutional Validity of Hindu Succession Act Provisions. The Court Found the Handwritten Will Validly Executed and Considered Whether Sections 8 and 15 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 Discriminate on Grounds of Gender in Succession Matters.
6 Nov 2012The judgment involved two testamentary suits before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay. In Testamentary Suit No. 48 of 2005, the plaintiff claimed...
- 25
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Dismissal of Suit Challenging Compulsory Purchase Order Under Income Tax Act. Suit Seeking Declaration That Compulsory Purchase Order Stood Abrogated Was Barred by Section 269-UN and Section 293 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, Which Exclude Civil Court Jurisdiction.
25 Apr 2025The appeal was filed against the order dated 7th April 2014 passed by a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dismissing the plaintiff's suit ...
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Validity of Forward Contract Prohibition; Contracts Void Under Section 3 of Travancore-Cochin Public Safety Measures Act 5 of 1950. Pre-Constitution Bill Did Not Require President’s Sanction Under Article 304(b) as No Amendment Covered by Article Was Moved.
9 Dec 1968The dispute arose from forward contracts for the purchase of coconut oil entered into in 1952 in the former Cochin State. The respondent, a commission...
- 10
High Court
Bombay High Court Commutes Death Penalty to Life Imprisonment in Multiple Murder Case — Land Dispute Led to Brutal Killing of Four Family Members, but Case Not 'Rarest of Rare'. The court upheld conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC for murder of four persons but found mitigating circumstances outweighing aggravating factors, commuting death to life imprisonment.
13 Nov 2024The case arises from a brutal incident on 28 June 2015 where three accused, Haribhau Telgote (66), his wife Dwarkabai (55), and their son Shyam (35), ...
- 367
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds OBC Reservation in All-India Quota Medical Seats — Constitutionality of Reservation for Backward Classes in State-Surrendered Seats Affirmed. Court holds that reservation in AIQ seats is permissible and does not violate the principle of merit, and that the executive can introduce reservation in AIQ seats without legislation.
20 Jan 2022This judgment pertains to a batch of writ petitions challenging the reservation for Other Backward Classes (OBC) and Economically Weaker Section (EWS)...
- 199
