Search Results for "interlocutory order challenge"

1156 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1156 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Reviews Challenge to CCI Investigation Order in Online Marketplaces Case — Petitioners Contend Lack of Prima Facie Opinion and Appreciable Adverse Effect on Competition Under Section 26(1) of Competition Act, 2002.

The dispute involves writ petitions filed by Amazon Seller Services Private Limited and Flipkart Internet Private Limited, challenging an order dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Notice to Show Cause in Execution of Consent Decree — Order 21 Rule 22 CPC Notice Upheld as Procedural Step Not Final Adjudication.

The case arises from an appeal filed by Dr. Amir Fidahusain and others against an order dated 12th June, 2006 passed by a learned single Judge of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Petitioner to File Written Statement Beyond 90 Days in Partition Suit. Order VIII Rule 1 CPC Held Directory, Not Mandatory — Trial Court's Rejection Quashed on Payment of Costs.

The petitioner, Sri S. Indushekhar, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 25/11/202...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Dismissal of Bus Conductor in MSRTC Misconduct Case — Labour Court Findings of Valid Enquiry and Proportionality of Punishment Upheld. Domestic Enquiry Found Fair and Proper; Dismissal for Issuing Tickets for Shorter Distance Despite Collecting Full Fare Upheld.

The petitioner, Baban Kashinath Hase, was employed as a Bus Conductor with the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC) since 30.4.1989. O...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Amendment in Commercial IP Suit Due to Delay and Lack of Due Diligence. Amendment After Commencement of Trial Not Allowed Under Order VI Rule 17 CPC as Plaintiffs Failed to Show They Could Not Have Raised the Matter Earlier.

The present Interim Application No. 752 of 2024 was filed by the original plaintiffs, Ramnish Verma and Finesse Fashions Pvt. Ltd., in a pending Comme...