Search Results for "extension agreement"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "extension agreement"

1831 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1831 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Dealership Dispute — Holds Arbitrator Exceeded Jurisdiction by Awarding Damages Without Proper Evidence. The court found that the respondent's failure to collect goods caused the loss, and termination for supplying spurious goods was valid under the dealership agreement.

7 Feb 2019

The case involves cross arbitration petitions challenging an arbitral award arising from a dealership agreement between NOD Bearings Pvt. Ltd. (petiti...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Consumer in Electricity Contract Dispute Over Reduction of Load. The Court held that enhancements of contract demand constitute supplementary agreements to the initial agreement, and the three-year period under Regulation 9.2.1 of Jharkhand State Electricity Regulatory Commission (Electricity Supply Code) Regulations, 2005 runs from the initial agreement date, not from each enhancement.

30 Apr 2021

The dispute involved a small-scale industry, the respondent, seeking reduction of its contract demand for electricity supply from 4000 KVA to 1325 KVA...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Partial Arbitral Award on Jurisdiction — Draft Joint Executing Agreement Held to be Concluded Contract with Valid Arbitration Clause. The court upheld the arbitral tribunal's finding that the JEA was a concluded contract and the arbitration agreement was valid, subsisting and binding.

10 Jan 2019

The petitioner, M3NERGY Sdn.Bhd., a Malaysian company, challenged a partial arbitral award passed by a three-member tribunal. The partial award dealt ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding Up Petition Under Section 433(e) of Companies Act, 1956 for Debt Disputed in Good Faith. Petition Filed to Exert Pressure for Unreasonable Demands, Not for Recovery of Genuine Debt.

7 Jun 2006

The petitioner, Fomento Resorts And Hotels Ltd., filed a winding up petition under Section 433(e) of the Companies Act, 1956 against the respondent, G...

High Court

Bombay High Court Restrains Arbitration Against Non-Signatory Parent Company — No Arbitration Agreement Exists Between Plaintiff and Defendant No.1 Under Contract Between Subsidiary and Contractor. Court Holds That Absence of Privity of Contract and Definition of Parties in Arbitration Clause Preclude Binding Non-Signatory to Arbitration Under Section 45 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

14 Sep 2012

The plaintiff, JSW ISPAT Steel Limited, filed a suit seeking a declaration that there is no arbitration agreement between it and defendant No.1, Jeumo...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Contempt Proceedings Against Award Debtors for Wilful Disobedience of Court Orders in Arbitration Execution. The Court held that failure to comply with conditional orders for deposit of arbitral award amounts constitutes civil contempt under Section 2(b) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, as it demonstrates wilful disobedience and undermines judicial authority.

10 Mar 2022

The contempt petition was filed by the award creditor, Urban Infrastructure Real Estate Fund, against the respondents for alleged wilful disobedience ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Execution of Specific Performance Decree Despite Delay in Deposit of Balance Sale Consideration. Doctrine of Merger Applies When Appellate Court Confirms Trial Court Decree Without Modifying Time Limit.

23 Jul 2019

The appellant, Surinder Pal Soni, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell dated 8 December 2003 for agricultural land in Panchku...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by MIDC in Contract Breach Case — No Binding Contract Without Work Order. Mere acceptance of tender does not create contractual obligations; formal work order essential under tender conditions.

11 Feb 2021

The case involves an appeal by the Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation (MIDC) against a decree passed in Special Civil Suit No.99/2009, whe...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement to Sell Not Proved as Genuine Transaction. Court finds that the plaintiff failed to establish the execution and validity of the agreement to sell, and the suit was barred by limitation under Article 54 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

10 Sep 2015

The appellant, Mr. Arjun M. Menda, filed a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 read with Order XLI Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, agai...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Dealership Dispute Over Supply of Spurious Bearings and Non-Delivery. Court Upholds Termination for Breach of Implied Warranty of Genuineness but Remits Damages for Non-Delivery for Reconsideration.

7 Feb 2019

The judgment concerns cross arbitration petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award arisin...

37 38 39 40 41

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)