Search Results for "excess work"

1464 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1464 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes BPCL Circular Imposing Refill Ceiling Limits on LPG Distributors as Unilateral and Arbitrary. Distributorship Agreements Without Ceiling Limits Cannot Be Varied Unilaterally by Issuing Circulars.

The petitioners, seven LPG distributors of Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited (BPCL), challenged a circular dated 4 January 2018 and a subsequent co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Recovery of Excess Salary Paid to Retired Employees Due to Administrative Error. Recovery of excess payment from retired employees without fault on their part is impermissible under principles of equity and natural justice.

The petitioners, retired employees of New Arts, Commerce & Science College, Ahmednagar, filed writ petitions challenging the recovery of excess salary...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Developer's Appeals in Consumer Disputes Over Delayed Flat Possession -- NCDRC Orders Upheld for Completion, Compensation, and Costs Under Consumer Protection Act

The Supreme Court addressed three civil appeals arising from NCDRC orders in consumer complaints filed by flat buyers against Parsvnath Developers Ltd...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition by Mutual Fund Against Sales Tax Reassessment Orders — Holds Mutual Fund Not a Dealer Under MVAT Act, 2002. Reassessment Proceedings Initiated Beyond Limitation Period and Without Proper Sanction Are Invalid.

The petitioner, Axis Mutual Fund, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging several orders passed by the sales ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Adjudicates Appeals by Sahara Companies on SEBI's Regulatory Powers Over OFCDs. Case centers on Section 55A(b) Companies Act and compliance with DIP Guidelines for issuance of optionally fully convertible debentures.

The case involved two Sahara Group companies, Sahara India Real Estate Corporation Limited (SIRECL) and Sahara Housing Investment Corporation Limited ...