Search Results for "developer"

1228 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1228 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Stamp Duty Demand and Order in Writ Petition by Petitioner Against State of Maharashtra Under Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 Due to Time-Barred Proceedings and Erroneous Computation

The Petitioner, challenged Demand Notices and an Order by the Collector of Stamps and CCRA under the Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958, alleging a deficit i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Condition in IOD Requiring Registered Agreement with Tenant for Redevelopment. Condition No.10 in IOD directing that registered agreement with existing tenant not be submitted before CC is set aside as arbitrary and contrary to DCR.

The Petitioner, MIG (Bandra) Realtors and Builders Pvt. Ltd., a developer, acquired redevelopment rights over land admeasuring approximately 20149.40 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows in Part Appeals by Claimants and State in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute. Market Value of Agricultural Land Determined at Rs. 1,00,000 per Hectare Under Section 18 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894, with Interest on Enhanced Compensation.

The case involves four appeals arising from land acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The State of Maharashtra acquired agric...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Order Holding Suit Maintainable Despite MRTP Act Bar. Civil Court Jurisdiction Not Ousted Under Section 149 of MRTP Act Where Dispute Involves Title and Possession, Not Just Planning Violations.

The case involves a civil revision application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging an order dated 22/3/2013 passed by ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to Deemed Conveyance Under MOFA Act — Society Entitled to Conveyance of Both Plots. District Registrar's Order Under Section 11 of MOFA Act, 1963 Upheld as Developer Failed to Show Jurisdictional Error.

The petitioners, M/s. Sawant Constructions, a partnership firm and developer, challenged an order dated 21 June 2013 passed by the District Deputy Reg...