Search Results for "dangerous activities"

759 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 759 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Reliance on Extraneous Material. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Detaining Authority Failed to Properly Consider Relevant Material and Included Cases Where Petitioner Was Acquitted or Granted Bail.

The petitioner, Mohammad Sidhik Mohammad Kausar, challenged a detention order dated 30.09.2024 passed by the District Magistrate, Jalna under Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Single Offence Against Individual. Single Incident of Assault on Individual Does Not Constitute Threat to Public Order, Detention Order Set Aside.

The petitioner, Gopal Suresh Malik, challenged an order of preventive detention dated 24th August 2023 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Thane, un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind. Preventive detention set aside as the Detaining Authority failed to consider that the petitioner was already in judicial custody and no credible material showed likelihood of release on bail.

The petitioner, Daksh Juber Ghelani, challenged his preventive detention under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootle...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Compelling Reasons and Non-Application of Mind. Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based on Single Isolated Incident Without Satisfying 'Disturbed Area' Condition Under Section 2(a-1) of MPDA Act.

The petitioner, Siddant alias Siddharth Sanjay Marathe, challenged a detention order dated 7 February 2023 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Pune ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Proper Verification of In-Camera Statements. Detention order under Section 3(2) of MPDA Act set aside as detaining authority failed to verify in-camera statements and did not consider that the alleged incident was a public agitation.

The petitioner, Avinash @ Balu Atmaram More, challenged his detention order dated 07-06-2022 passed under Section 3(2) of the Maharashtra Prevention o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Non-Consideration of Representation. Preventive Detention Invalidated as Detaining Authority Failed to Properly Consider Detenu's Representation and Apply Mind to Material.

The petitioner, Jaggu Sardar @ Jagdish Tirathsing Labana @ Punjabi, challenged his detention order dated 14 October 2019 passed by the Commissioner of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Translation of Vital Documents. Failure to Provide Marathi Translation of English Documents Violates Detenu's Right to Make Effective Representation Under Article 22(5) of Constitution.

The petitioner, Vicky @ Munna Mahesh Shinde, challenged a preventive detention order dated 15 October 2019 passed by the District Magistrate, Ahmednag...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Non-Application of Mind and Unreasonable Delay. Court holds that reliance on fabricated offences and lack of live link between alleged activities and detention order vitiates preventive detention.

The petitioner, Anil s/o Ramesh Manglani, challenged a detention order dated 21.09.2016 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Nagpur City under Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Due to Untruthful Translation of Grounds in Preventive Detention Case. Failure to Furnish Correct Marathi Translation Violates Article 22(5) of Constitution and Section 3 of Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981.

The petitioner, father of the detenu Shanidas Parshuram Mhatre, challenged the detention order dated 8.10.2004 passed by the Commissioner of Police, T...