WRIT PETITION (ST) NO. 1338 OF 2020
1 Jan 1970...
Search Results for "civil suit stay"
2790 result(s) found
Found 2790 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Eviction Decree Against Tenant for Arrears of Rent — Notice Served at School Address Valid. Service of notice at tenant's school address held sufficient under Section 106 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882 when tenant is known to be employed there and refuses to accept notice at suit premises.
15 Jul 2024The dispute arises from a suit for eviction filed by the landlord (respondent) against the tenant (petitioner) in respect of three rooms and an enclos...
- 435
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Application to Dismiss Misc. Civil Application in Execution Proceedings. Court holds that a third party purchaser cannot challenge a decree for specific performance without impleading himself in the suit, and the remedy lies in filing a separate suit for declaration of title.
25 Jul 2017The revision application was filed by Rajkumar Singh challenging the order dated 30.8.2016 passed by the District Judge-13, Nagpur, rejecting his appl...
- 37
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Appointment of Court Commissioner in Execution of Partition Decree. Executing Court's Order to Appoint Commissioner to Propose Mode of Execution Upheld as Not Final and Subject to Objections.
13 Nov 2019The petitioner, Pramod Dattatraya Kand, the judgment debtor, challenged an order dated 07.09.2019 passed by the Executing Court in Final Decree Applic...
- 134
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Re-Development Agreement and Bye-Law Amendments in Co-operative Housing Society. Court Holds That Re-Development Agreement and Bye-Law Amendments Without General Body Approval Are Void Under Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960.
9 Jun 2026The petitioner, B. K. Corporation, an association of persons, filed a writ petition challenging the validity of a re-development agreement and bye-law...
- 349
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Appellate Court's Order Granting Temporary Injunction in Tenant Dispute. District Judge's Power to Reappreciate Evidence in Injunction Appeals Upheld Under Order 39 CPC.
12 Oct 2018The petitioners, Abidbhai and Musabhai, filed a writ petition challenging the judgment and order dated 17th January 2014 passed by the District Judge,...
- 75
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Eviction Decree in Suit Under Section 6 of Specific Relief Act — Plaintiff Proved Prior Possession and Dispossession Without Due Process of Law. The Court held that a suit for possession based on prior possession under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 is maintainable even against the true owner if the plaintiff was in settled possession and was dispossessed otherwise than in due course of law.
26 Nov 2015The case involves a Civil Revision Application filed by the original defendants (Smita Prakash Chikhale and Sunita Dharnidhar Chikhale) against the ju...
- 128
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Directs Payment of Occupational Charges in Landlord-Tenant Dispute Pending Determination of Applicable Tenancy Law. The Court held that a tenant continuing in possession after forfeiture of lease is liable to pay mesne profits at market rate, not contractual rent, under Section 2(12) CPC.
15 Feb 2024The Supreme Court was hearing special leave petitions filed by a landlord challenging a judgment of the Calcutta High Court which held that the landlo...
- 1164
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Civil Revision in Eviction Suit — Lease Deed Not Duly Proved Under Evidence Act. Court holds that secondary evidence of a supplementary lease deed was inadmissible without proper foundation for leading secondary evidence under Section 65 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.
5 Nov 2020The case arises from a civil revision application challenging a judgment and decree of the appellate bench of the Court of Small Causes at Mumbai, whi...
- 139
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Refusal to Stay Appeal Pending Application to Set Aside Ex-Parte Decree. Explanation to Order 9 Rule 13 CPC Does Not Confer Automatic Right to Stay; Conduct of Defendants Justified Refusal.
3 Nov 2020The petitioners, original defendants in a suit for specific performance of contract, challenged an order of the Principal District and Sessions Judge,...
- 68
