Search Results for "carry forward and set off"

595 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 595 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit Despite Defendant's Preliminary Objections. Plaintiff's Mark 'ESSEL' Found to Have Acquired Distinctiveness and Defendant's Use Likely to Cause Confusion.

The plaintiff, Essel Propack Ltd., filed a suit in 2010 against Essel Kitchenware Ltd. and another defendant for trademark infringement and passing of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Challenge to No Confidence Motion Against Bar Association President. Petition Seeks to Quash Resolution Passed on 20 September 2025 on Grounds that Bye-laws Do Not Provide for Such Motion.

The petitioner, as President of the Belagavi Bar Association, challenged a resolution passed in a Special General Body Meeting on 20 September 2025 th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The present appeal was filed by original accused Nos.1 and 2, Manohar and Uttam Sadavarte, challenging their conviction by the learned Additional Sess...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows NCDC's Appeal in Income Tax Dispute Over Deduction of Grants as Revenue Expenditure. Grants disbursed by a statutory corporation as part of its business are deductible under Section 37 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, regardless of the capital nature of the source funds.

The National Co-operative Development Corporation (NCDC), established under the National Co-operative Development Corporation Act, 1962, is a statutor...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute — No Patent Illegality Found. Claimant's claim for refund of margin money and compensation for unauthorized trades upheld as arbitrator's findings of fact are final under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The judgment concerns two arbitration petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging a common arbitral award da...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award in Commodity Trading Dispute — Holds That Arbitral Tribunal Erred in Rejecting Claim for Unauthorized Trades Without Considering Evidence of Unauthorized Transactions.

The petitioner, Mrs. Kaberi Mondal, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging portions of an arbitr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Reserves Judgment in Section 34 Petition Challenging Arbitral Award Alleging Res Judicata and Patent Illegality; Decision on Coercion and Interest Awaited.

The petition challenged an arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The petitioner, a multi-state co-operative b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes GCZMA Demolition Order for Lack of Quorum and Violation of Natural Justice. Petitioner's 18 rooms saved as sub-committee meeting with only 4 members violated requirement of 5 members for cases directed by High Court.

The petitioner, Shri Sylvestre D'Souza, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 15/02...