Search Results for "block development officer"

1302 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1302 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Alleging Encroachment Based on Revenue Records. Petitioner's claim of encroachment on S.F.Nos.416 and 418/49 rejected as Tahsildar's counter stated no encroachment exists.

The petitioner, M.Ramadurai, filed a writ petition before the Madras High Court seeking a direction to the 1st respondent, the District Collector of P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Reserves Judgment on Cross Appeals in Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Dispute. Court Considers Market Value Determination and Development Charges Deduction for Acquired Land.

The case involved cross appeals arising from a land acquisition compensation dispute under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The landowner, Nalini, owne...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Closes Writ Petition for Removal of Encroachment Due to Petitioner's Counsel Reporting No Instructions. Petitioner failed to pursue the matter, leading to closure without adjudication on merits.

The petitioner, Veera Kumar, filed a writ petition before the Madras High Court seeking a direction to the respondents 1 to 3 (District Collector, Blo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Closes Writ Petition for Non-Prosecution Due to Counsel's Lack of Instructions. Petitioner sought removal of alleged encroachment on government road and Vaikkal Poromboke but counsel reported no instructions, leading to closure without merits adjudication.

The petitioner, Veera Kumar, filed a writ petition before the Madras High Court seeking a direction to respondents 1 to 3 (District Collector, Block D...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Considers Writ Petition for Enforcement of Building Plan Violations. Court Examines Prayer for Mandamus to Direct Authorities to Act Against Unauthorized Construction in Kancheepuram District.

The matter involved a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by the petitioner association, which represented owners in th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Removal of Arch Allegedly Encroaching on Public Road — No Encroachment Found During Survey by Revenue Authorities. The court held that since the Tahsildar's survey revealed no encroachment, the writ of mandamus could not be granted.

The petitioner, S. Saranya, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madras High Court seeking a writ of mandam...