Search Results for "beneficiary company"

507 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 507 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Income Tax Reassessment Case Due to Lack of Fresh Material and No Failure to Disclose. Reopening Beyond Four Years Invalid as Revenue Failed to Allege Non-Disclosure Under Section 147 of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The petitioner, Sun Tan Trading Co. Ltd., is engaged in the business of import and distribution of alcoholic beverages in India. It had entered into a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for AY 2007-2008. Failure to Assess Consideration Under Distribution Agreement Constitutes Income Escaping Assessment.

The petitioner, Sun Tan Trading Co. Ltd., is engaged in the business of import and distribution of alcoholic beverages in India. It entered into a Dis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Agreement for Sale of Open Amenity Space by Municipal Corporation to Private Developer. Municipal Corporation Cannot Alienate Public Amenity Space Reserved Under Development Plan Without Following Statutory Procedure Under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

The petitioner, Prashant Bhagwantrao Palande, a resident of Mira Road, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challengin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Challenging Reduction of Pension by Syndicate Bank — Violation of Natural Justice and Pension Regulations. Reduction of two-third pension without show cause notice set aside; bank directed to restore full pension and pay arrears.

The petitioner, B. Narayana Rao, was appointed as a Clerk in Syndicate Bank on 22.5.1972 and rose to the position of Senior Manager in Grade Scale-V b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Unilateral Modification of Development Control Regulations by State. Held that DCRs are statutory and cannot be altered without following due process under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by D B Realty Limited and Salim Balwa (WP No.366 of 2014) and Savita Homemakers LLP and Akkshay Jain (W...