SPECIAL CASE NO. 3 OF 2001
6 Jan 2015The Special Court (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities) Act, 1992, presided over by Justice Roshan Dalvi, heard Special Case No. ...
Search Results for "Section 2(54)"
966 result(s) found
Found 966 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Section 14 Petitions to Terminate Arbitrator Mandate Due to Deemed Waiver of Right to Object. Arbitrator appointed by Co-operative Bank under MSCS Act failed to disclose interest and continued proceedings despite jurisdictional challenge, leading to termination of mandate.
9 Jan 2023The petitioners, Kalpesh Shantikumar Mehta and others, along with KSM Multitrade LLP and others, filed two petitions under Section 14 of the Arbitrati...
- 92
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals Under Section 58 of RERA Act Against Orders of Adjudicating Officer and Goa RERA. Maintainability of Second Appeal Under RERA Act Questioned - Held That Section 58 of RERA Act Does Not Provide for a Second Appeal to the High Court Against Orders of the Real Estate Appellate Tribunal.
12 Jan 2023The appellant, Adam A. Jumma, proprietor of Aman Builders and Developers, Goa, filed two second appeals under Section 58 of the Real Estate (Regulatio...
- 106
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals of Retired Employees Against Cooperative Bank's SARFAESI Recovery Proceedings. Employees Held Not to Be 'Borrowers' and Lack Locus Standi to Challenge Auction Sale Without Payment of Dues.
30 Nov -0001The judgment pertains to a batch of Letters Patent Appeals filed by retired employees of Shamrao Vithal Cooperative Bank Ltd. against the dismissal of...
- 113
High Court
Madras High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeals in Insurance Company Tax Case — Upholds ITAT Order on Disallowance of Claims and Deductions. The court held that the assessee's method of accounting for outstanding claims and the deduction under Section 80M were correctly allowed by the Tribunal.
9 Jan 2025The case involves a batch of appeals filed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai, under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, again...
- 135
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition of Widowed Senior Citizen Seeking Restoration of Possession of House Forcibly Taken by Money-Lender. Court Directs Police to Restore Possession Within Four Weeks, Holding Police Have Duty to Act Against Forcible Dispossession.
23 Nov 2016The petitioner, Smt. Pachamma, a 68-year-old widowed senior citizen belonging to the Scheduled Caste, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227...
- 47
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Conviction and Death Sentence for Rape and Murder of a Seven-Year-Old Girl in a Rarest of Rare Case. Circumstantial Evidence Including Last Seen, Recovery of Body at Instance of Accused, and Medical Evidence Sufficient to Prove Guilt Under Sections 376, 302, 201 IPC and Section 5/6 POCSO.
20 Apr 2023The appellant, Pappu, was convicted for the rape and murder of a seven-year-old girl. On 13.05.2015, the victim was playing near her home when the app...
- 250
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Inclusion of Medical Establishments under Maharashtra Shops and Establishments Act, 2017. Medical Profession Held to Have Commercial Aspect; Registration Requirement for Nursing Homes with Ten or More Employees is Valid and Not Repugnant to Central Clinical Establishments Act.
2 Nov 2018The petitioner, Dr. Pradeep Arora, a medical practitioner and owner of Arora Hospital in Nagpur, challenged the definition of 'establishment' under Se...
- 161
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Sets Aside DRAT Pre-Deposit Condition in SARFAESI Appeal — Petitioner Granted Relief Without Pre-Deposit. The Court held that the DRAT's power to waive or reduce pre-deposit under Section 18 of the SARFAESI Act is discretionary and must be exercised judiciously, and that the condition of depositing 25% of the debt amount was onerous and disproportionate.
1 Jul 2020The petitioner, M/s. Sanjeevini Drug House, a proprietorship concern, had availed credit facilities from Kavery Grameena Bank (respondent No.1). Upon ...
- 85
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Chamber Summons to Raise Attachment Under Order 21 Rule 54 CPC — Bona Fide Purchaser for Value Without Notice of Decree Protected. The court held that an attachment order served after the purchaser had paid full consideration and obtained possession is not binding on the purchaser.
6 Apr 2005The present chamber summons was taken out by the applicant, Rajneesh Agarwal & Associates P. Ltd, seeking to raise an attachment under Order 21 Rule 5...
- 153
