Search Results for "Rule 137"

1164 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1164 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Nagpur Bench Dismisses Second Appeal in Motor Vehicle Tax Recovery Suit Holding Civil Court Jurisdiction Impliedly Barred. Suit Against State Authorities Barred by Order 9 Rule 9 CPC and Alternate Remedy Under Bombay Motor Vehicle Taxes Act, 1958 Precludes Civil Suit.

The second appeal arose from a suit filed by M/s Pandurang & Krishnarao Co., the owner of a truck, which was sold to defendant no.4 and subsequently t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, Adjudicates Family Court Appeal No.13 of 2008 in Divorce Matter. Appeal Filed by Husband Challenges Dismissal of Divorce Petition Seeking Decree on Grounds of Cruelty and Desertion.

The appeal before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, arose from the dismissal of a divorce petition by the Family Court, Aurang...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Compulsory Retirement Order of IRS Officer Due to Bias and Malice. Compulsory retirement under Rule 56(j) of Fundamental Rules, 1922, set aside as it was punitive, violated natural justice due to biased committee members, and disregarded clean service record.

The dispute involved an Indian Revenue Service officer challenging his compulsory retirement under Rule 56(j) of the Fundamental Rules, ordered three ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Amendment Application in Partition Suit. Amendment Sought After Commencement of Trial Not Allowed Under Order VI Rule 17 CPC Due to Lack of Due Diligence.

The petitioners, Hemlata Harish Bhatia and Bharat Vallabhdas Bhatia, filed a suit for partition in 2004 against the respondents, Vallabhdas Lalchand D...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Adjudicates Appeals by Sahara Companies on SEBI's Regulatory Powers Over OFCDs. Case centers on Section 55A(b) Companies Act and compliance with DIP Guidelines for issuance of optionally fully convertible debentures.

The case involved two Sahara Group companies, Sahara India Real Estate Corporation Limited (SIRECL) and Sahara Housing Investment Corporation Limited ...