Search Results for "Rehabilitation grant"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Rehabilitation grant"

884 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 884 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case, Quashing High Court Order Declaring Proceedings Lapsed. Acquisition Upheld as Physical Possession Taken and Land Utilized for Public Purpose, Despite Non-Payment of Compensation, Under Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.

24 Feb 2023

The dispute arose from a land acquisition case where the High Court of Delhi allowed a writ petition, declaring that acquisition proceedings under the...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Partly Allows Appeals for Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition for Rehabilitation Project. Court Condones Delay and Grants 10% Cumulative Escalation for Potential Development, Denies Interest for Delayed Filing.

30 Jul 2019

The Supreme Court partly allowed appeals by claimants seeking enhanced compensation for land acquired for the Hirehalla project. The Government notifi...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Resolution Professional in IBC Moratorium Dispute. Section 14(1)(d) of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 prohibits owner from recovering property occupied by corporate debtor during moratorium, even under joint development agreement.

19 Feb 2020

The appeal arose from a dispute concerning the interpretation of Section 14(1)(d) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC). The appellant, Ra...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Juvenile Cannot File Anticipatory Bail Under Section 438 CrPC; Remedy Lies Under Juvenile Justice Act. The JJ Act is a complete code providing for bail provisions for children in conflict with law, and Section 438 CrPC is not available to them.

15 Jul 2022

The case involved a reference to a Division Bench of the Bombay High Court to decide whether a juvenile in conflict with law can file an application f...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Fishermen Cooperative's Petition Against Demolition of Fishermen Huts in Coastal Zone. Court Holds That Traditional Fishing Communities Have Customary Rights to Occupy Foreshore Land for Livelihood, Subject to Environmental Clearances Under CRZ Notification, 2011.

12 Aug 2021

The petitioner, Mariyayi Macchimaar Sahkari Sanstha Maryadit, a cooperative society of traditional fishermen, filed a writ petition challenging the pr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against EPF Appellate Tribunal Order Dismissing Appeal on Limitation Grounds. Sick Industrial Company's Appeal Under Section 7I of Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 Held Maintainable Despite Delay Due to Financial Hardship.

5 Apr 2010

The petitioner, New Great Eastern Spinning & Weaving Co. Ltd., a sick industrial company since 1987, challenged an order dated 11 November 2009 passed...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Victims of Trafficking to Return to Home State in ITPA Case — Detention in Government Shelter Set Aside. Court held that victims of sex trafficking cannot be forcibly detained in a government shelter against their will for one year under Section 17 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956, and must be repatriated to their home state if they so desire.

9 Aug 2019

The case involves four victims of sex trafficking who were rescued from a brothel in Mumbai. They were produced before the Metropolitan Magistrate, wh...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Victims of Trafficking to Return to Their Families in Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act Case — Held That Protective Custody Cannot Be Imposed Against the Will of Major Victims Without Just Cause. The court set aside the Magistrate's order directing the victims to be kept in a protective home for one year, holding that Section 17 of the ITPA does not authorize forcible confinement of major victims.

21 Aug 2019

The petitioners, four women who were victims of trafficking and rescued from a brothel, challenged the order of the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sanctions Scheme of Arrangement for Demerger and Restructuring of Nocil Under Sections 391-394 of Companies Act, 1956. Court Approves Demerger of Petrochemicals and Polymer Division and Plastic Products Division into Two Separate Companies, Subject to Conditions Including Employee Protection and Compliance with Accounting Standards.

8 Jun 2005

The Bombay High Court considered three company petitions filed under sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, by National Organic Chemical Indu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Impleadment Application in Specific Performance Suit — No Right, Title or Interest in Suit Property at Time of Agreement. Subsequent purchaser/developer not entitled to be impleaded under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC as decree would bind them.

20 Sep 2013

The Bombay High Court dismissed a chamber summons filed by M/s Space Developer, a registered partnership firm, seeking impleadment as a party defendan...

37 38 39 40 41

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)