Search Results for "Partition deed"

1419 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1419 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Partition Suit — Confirms Half Share to Plaintiff. Sale Deed Executed by Father Without Legal Necessity Held Not Binding on Daughter as Coparcener Under Hindu Succession Act, 1956.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the defendants (appellants) against the judgment and decree in R.A. No. 207/1997, which confirmed the trial...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in CPC Case — Sets Aside Ex Parte Interim Injunction for Non-Compliance with Order VI Rule 17 CPC. Appellant-Defendant's Application for Rejection of Plaint Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC Dismissed as Not Maintainable at Interim Stage.

The appellant, Hinduja Renewables Two Private Limited, was the defendant No.6 in OS No.225/2021 pending before the Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Sindha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeals in Partition Suit — Confirms Trial Court's Decree for Partition and Separate Possession. Daughters Granted Equal Share in Joint Family Property Under Hindu Succession Act, 1956.

The case involves a partition suit filed by the plaintiffs, who are the sons and daughters of Mahalingappa Wali, seeking a share in the joint family p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Appeal in Partition Suit, Sets Aside Trial Court Decree. Settlement Deed Executed by Father with Concurrence of Daughters Held Valid and Binding.

The case involves a partition suit filed by three sisters against their brother. The suit property was originally purchased by their grandfather and l...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Injunction Suit — Reverses Appellate Court's Dismissal and Restores Trial Court's Decree. Held that the appellate court erred in reversing the trial court's judgment without properly considering the evidence regarding possession and title.

The appellants, as plaintiffs, filed a suit for bare injunction in O.S.No.52 of 2008 before the District Munsif Court, Thuraiyur, seeking to restrain ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Suit, Sets Aside Concurrent Findings of Courts Below. Court Holds That Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Title and Possession Over Suit Property, and That the Trial Court Erred in Decreeing the Suit Without Proper Consideration of Evidence.

The case involves a property dispute between the appellants (original defendants) and the respondents (original plaintiffs) over agricultural land. Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises under Section 100 CPC when findings are based on appreciation of evidence and not perverse.

The case involves a property dispute between the appellants (original defendants) and the respondents (original plaintiffs) concerning land in Village...