Search Results for "Omissions and Contradictions"

976 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 976 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Examines State's Criminal Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case Arising Out of Land Dispute. Accused Were Charged Under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302 IPC for Allegedly Attacking Deceased With Axes; Trial Court Acquitted Due to Inconsistencies in Evidence.

The State of Maharashtra filed an appeal against the acquittal of six accused in a murder case arising out of a land dispute. The prosecution case was...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Appeals Against Conviction for Criminal Conspiracy and Murder Under Sections 120B, 302 r/w 34 IPC. Appeals Challenge Reliability of Eye-Witness Identification and Dying Declaration, Along with Conspiracy Evidence Against Accused Nos. 4 to 6.

The Bombay High Court heard five criminal appeals arising out of Sessions Case No.164 of 2011 decided by the Sessions Judge, Solapur on 8 May 2014. Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Dowry Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Demand of Dowry Soon Before Death. Conviction under Section 304B IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish that the deceased was subjected to cruelty or harassment in connection with dowry demand 'soon before her death'.

The appellant, Mangesh Deorao Kannake, was convicted under Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code for the dowry death of his wife, Shefali. The marriag...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Dying Declaration. Dying declaration found suspicious as deceased was under influence of medication and relatives present, not recorded by Magistrate, and not corroborated by other evidence.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of Umesh Digambar Jadhav (respondent-accused) for the murder of his wife Meenakshi by pouring ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Doubtful Eyewitness Accounts and Defective Investigation. Appeal Allowed as Prosecution Failed to Prove Charges Under IPC Sections 302, 307, 120B, 341 Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

Background: The appeal arose from the judgment of the Sessions Court, Washim in Sessions Case No. 73 of 2003, whereby three accused were convicted und...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Four Accused for Murder Under Section 302 IPC in Black Magic Motive Case — Common Intention Established Through Eyewitness Testimony and Recovery of Weapon.

The case involves an appeal by four accused persons against their conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Triple Murder Case Under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC. Court found eye-witness testimony reliable and established common intention among accused, dismissing appeals against life imprisonment sentences.

The Supreme Court heard criminal appeals filed by three appellants challenging their conviction for murder under Section 302 read with Section 34 of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Eye-Witness Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Sandeep, was convicted under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC for the murder of Abdul Hameed on 30.10.1997. The prosecution alleged...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Conviction in Father-Daughter Rape Case Under IPC and POCSO Act. Minor Victim's Testimony and School Transfer Certificate Establish Age of 14, Making Consent Irrelevant and Supporting Conviction for Rape Under Sections 376 IPC and 4,6 POCSO Act.

By the present criminal appeal, the appellant, who was convicted by the Special Judge and Additional Sessions Judge, Kelapur in Special Case No.28/201...