Search Results for "Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority"

1029 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1029 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court heard challenge to deemed conveyance order under MOFA; developer alleged res judicata due to consent decree. Developer contended that Competent Authority lacked jurisdiction under Section 11(3) when consent decree already provided for conveyance.

The writ petition was filed by developers challenging an order of deemed conveyance passed by the Competent Authority under Section 11(3) of the Mahar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows PIL Seeking Removal of Petrol Pumps Near Bibi Ka Maqbara Heritage Site. Court directs relocation of petrol pumps within 500 meters of the protected monument under the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958 and Heritage Regulations.

The petitioner, Mr. Shahid Aslam, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) seeking the removal of petrol pum...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Hears Appeal Against Bombay High Court Judgment Upholding Sanction of Competing Slum Scheme; Appeal Ongoing.

The dispute centered on a 2,005 sq. mts. parcel in Malad, Mumbai, originally declared a slum in 1987 under the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Cl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Determines Fair Compensation in Appeal Against Enhanced Award Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Cross-Objections Seeking Higher Rate Considered Alongside State's Challenge to Reference Court's Award of Rs.1,500 per sq.m.

The State of Maharashtra acquired land in Village Padghe, Taluka Panvel, District Raigad, for the New Bombay Project under the Land Acquisition Act, 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State Appeal in Land Acquisition Case for MRTS Project — High Court Direction for Alternate Site Quashed. Court holds that once acquisition is complete and possession taken, no direction for alternate site can be issued under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The case involves appeals by the State of Tamil Nadu against a common judgment of the Madras High Court directing allotment of alternate land to priva...