Search Results for "Karnataka Act 1990"

1236 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1236 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Contempt Appeal, Sets Aside Conviction for Willful Disobedience of Court Order in Land Dispute. Appellants Held Not Guilty of Contempt as Order Was Ambiguous and Compliance Was Not Willfully Disobeyed.

The case arises from a contempt appeal under Section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, filed by Tejram, Laxman, and Ramu Hazare (appellants) aga...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Civil Appeal in Arbitration Dispute, Restoring Arbitral Award Modified by Lower Courts. Judicial Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is Limited, and Courts Cannot Re-appreciate Evidence or Modify Awards on Merits.

The dispute arose from a construction contract between a civil engineering contractor and the Karnataka State Public Works Department for building off...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Confirmatory Order Under Section 321(3) of Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976 Due to Lack of Notice. Notice under Section 308 of KMC Act Held Not a Substitute for Notice under Section 321(1), Necessitating Separate Provisional Order Before Confirmation.

The matter arose from a writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, challenging the order of the III Additional Distr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR and Orders Compensation for Unauthorized Sealing of Cable Network Control Room — Police Action Without Statutory Authority Violates Fundamental Rights Under Article 19(1)(g) of Constitution of India.

The petitioners, a partnership firm running a cable television network under the name U.S.A. Cable Networks and its members, filed a writ petition und...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Disciplinary Proceedings Initiated After Retirement Without Sanction — Proceedings Quashed as Void Ab Initio for Violation of Regulation 16(3) of BESCOM/KPTCL CDA Regulations, 1975

The petitioners, former employees of BESCOM and KPTCL, retired from service between 2014 and 2016. After their retirement, disciplinary proceedings we...