Search Results for "Departmental disciplinary proceedings"

1040 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1040 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows State's Revision and Dismisses Accused's Revision in Lokayukta Corruption Case — Sanction for Prosecution Under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Must Be Granted by Competent Authority Before Taking Cognizance, Not Before Filing Charge Sheet.

The case involves two criminal revision petitions arising from an order dated 23.08.2017 passed by the LXXVI Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Employer Challenging Dismissed Employee's Entitlement to Gratuity Under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. Dismissal Constitutes 'Retirement' Under Section 2(q) and Forfeiture Requires Specific Order Under Section 4(6) — Employee Entitled to Gratuity Despite Dismissal.

The case involves a writ petition filed by the Chairman cum Managing Director of Western Coalfields Ltd. challenging the entitlement of respondent No....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Labour Court's Preliminary Finding on Fairness of Domestic Enquiry in Service Dispute. Enquiry Not Vitiated by Alleged Victimization or Bias as Labour Court's Decision Was Based on Evidence and Not Perverse.

The petitioner, Shri Tanaji Shankar Anuse, was employed as a Junior Clerk by the respondent, Maharashtra Rajya Doodh Sahakari Mahasangh Maahanand Dudh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Petition Challenging Gratuity Payment to Retired Employee. Forfeiture of Gratuity under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 requires proof of financial loss caused by employee's misconduct, not merely disciplinary punishment of compulsory retirement.

The petitioner, Bank of Maharashtra, challenged the orders of the Controlling Authority and Appellate Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 197...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Interest on Delayed Gratuity from Date of Retirement in Corruption Case Acquittal. Interest under Section 7(3A) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 is payable from retirement date, not acquittal date, as gratuity becomes due on retirement regardless of pending criminal prosecution.

The petitioner, Vinodkumar Narayan Dixit, a former Deputy Collector, retired on 1st April 1997 while a criminal prosecution under the Prevention of Co...