KAHC010159832015_1
15 Dec 2017...
Search Results for "Bandra"
1655 result(s) found
Found 1655 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Examines Challenge to SEBI Special Court's Rejection of Compounding Application Under Section 24A of SEBI Act. Writ Petition Filed Against Order Denying Compounding of Offence Under Section 24(2) for Non-Payment of Penalty Without SEBI Consent.
30 Oct 2018The case involved a criminal writ petition filed by N.H. Securities Ltd. and its directors seeking to quash an order of the SEBI Special Court that ha...
- 29
High Court
High Court of Bombay Dismisses Husband's Petition Challenging Interim Maintenance Order Under Domestic Violence Act. Muslim Wife's Claim for Interim Maintenance Upheld Despite Husband's Talaq and Muslim Personal Law.
4 May 2018The case involved a challenge by the husband against an interim maintenance order passed by the Family Court at Bandra in favor of his wife and two mi...
- 37
High Court
Bombay High Court Delivers Judgment on Writ Petition Challenging Family Court's Custody Order in International Abduction Case. The Court Examined the Applicability of Hague Convention and Jurisdictional Overlaps Between Indian and Dutch Forums.
13 Apr 2018The judgment addresses a custody dispute between parents of a minor daughter, Insiya. The father, an Indian citizen, and the mother, a dual citizen of...
- 49
High Court
High Court of Bombay Considers Revision Against SEBI Special Court's Rejection of Discharge in SEBI Prosecution for Non-Payment of Penalty. Vicarious Liability of Directors Under Section 27 SEBI Act Questioned Due to Absence of Specific Averments in Complaint.
15 Jan 2018The matter arose from four Criminal Revision Applications filed before the High Court of Bombay challenging a common order of the SEBI Special Court t...
- 22
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to ONGC Promotion Regulations and Supercession of Scheduled Caste Employee. The court examines whether the arbitrary change in promotion criteria without amending the Modified Recruitment and Promotion Regulations, 1980, violates the statutory scheme and results in unjust supercession of the SC employee.
22 Sep 2017The judgment arose from four writ petitions filed by employees of the Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited (ONGC) challenging their supercession in...
- 40
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses/Allows Petitions in JVPD Scheme Open Space Dispute — MHADA's Authority to Convert Garden Plots to Residential Use under Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority Act, 1976 Addressed. Detailed Legal Issues Including Consent Terms and Maintainability of Appeal Not Decided.
19 Jul 2017This common judgment deals with two writ petitions concerning the protection of open spaces in the Juhu Vile Parle Development Scheme (JVPD Scheme) at...
- 51
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Service Protection Claims in Caste Invalidation Cases After Supreme Court Overrules Full Bench Decision. Supreme Court in FCI v. Jagdish Balaram Bahira Overrules Arun Sonone, Potentially Denying Protection to Petitioners Whose Scheduled Tribe Certificates Were Invalidated.
17 Jul 2017The judgment arose from a batch of writ petitions filed before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, wherein petitioners sought protection in service a...
- 79
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Dismisses Petitioner's Writ Petition Against MHADA Eviction Order; Claim of Breach of Natural Justice Rejected Due to Illegal Occupation Without Occupation Certificate. Court Holds That a Person Occupying Premises Without Occupation Certificate Cannot Invoke Natural Justice to Prolong Unlawful Occupation and That Equitable Relief Under Article 226 is Not Available to a Litigant With Unclean Hands.
17 Oct 2025The petitioner, a businessman, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an ex-parte order dated 7 January 2025 passed by the Exe...
- 244
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Against State's Allotment of Surplus Land Under ULC Act — Petitioner Failed to Establish Any Right After Repeal. Land vested in the State under Sections 8, 9, and 10 of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, prior to its repeal, remains with the State and cannot revert merely because the Act was subsequently repealed.
27 Oct 2016The matter before the Bombay High Court arose from a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by Chhaganlal Khimji and Co. L...
- 19
