Search Results for "technical error"

2186 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2186 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Set Aside Ex-Parte Order in Property Dispute Due to Limitation. Delay of Over 3 Years in Challenging Ex-Parte Decree Under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC Held Not Sufficiently Explained.

The case involves a Chamber Summons filed by the Plaintiff/Applicant, Smt. Gopi, widow of Tarachand R. Advani, seeking to set aside an ex-parte order ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Labour Court's Finding of Perversity in Domestic Enquiry Against Workman. Concurrent Findings of Perversity Upheld as Inquiry Officer's Findings Were Based on No Evidence and Contrary to Record.

The petitioner, M/s Crane Process Flow Technologies Pvt. Ltd., an engineering company, challenged the judgment and order of the Industrial Court, Sata...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Reference Rejection Set Aside Due to Procedural Error. Power of Attorney Holder Entitled to Maintain Reference Under Section 54(1) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The appellant, Santosh S. Nayak, as Power of Attorney holder of the land owner Manappa Ramappa Lamani, filed a reference under Section 18 of the Land ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Reopening of Assessment Under Section 147(a) for Income Tax on Minimum Guarantee Receipts from Film Sale. Assessee's Failure to Disclose Full Consideration for Sale of Movie 'Charas' Justifies Reassessment Despite Partial Acceptance of Addition.

The case involves an income tax reference at the instance of the assessee, who sold a movie titled 'Charas' to M/s. Prakash Pictures on a minimum guar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Metro Fare Hike; Judicial Review Not Permitted Over Specialist Committee's Decision Under Metro Act. Fare Fixation Committee's Determination Based on Section 34 Prevails Over Contractual Fare Stipulations, Limited to Checking Arbitrariness or Perversity.

The writ petition challenged the Fare Fixation Committee's decision to increase Mumbai Metro fares from Rs.9-13 to Rs.10-110 from January 2015. The pe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Award in Joint Venture Dispute. Petition Seeks Enforcement Under Section 48 of Arbitration Act; Allegations Include Breach of JVA and Conflict of Interest.

The petitioner, an Italian company engaged in cable manufacturing, entered into a Joint Venture Agreement dated 19th January 2010 with the respondents...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal and Restores Trial Court Decree in Timber Supply Payment Dispute. Misdescription of Proprietorship Firm Name Does Not Invalidate Suit; Amendment Relates Back to Original Filing and Overcomes Limitation Bar.

The dispute arose from a civil suit for recovery of the price of timber supplied. Manohar Lal, son of Jai Jai Ram, carried on business as a commission...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Procedural Defects and Insufficient Evidence - Fundamental Error in Framing Charge Under Deleted Provision and Inconsistent Testimony Fail to Sustain Conviction Under IPC

The High Court allowed the criminal appeal filed by Appellant against his conviction and life imprisonment under Section 376(3) of the Indian Penal Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Stamp Duty Paid Under Mistake of Law — Petitioner Entitled to Refund of Rs. 3,00,100/- for Electronic Stamps Purchased Under Wrong Scheme Code. Mistake of Law Does Not Bar Refund When Stamps Not Used and No Unjust Enrichment.

The petitioner, Manjeet Singh, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking a refund of stamp duty paid under a mistake of law. The peti...