Search Results for "secured asset"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "secured asset"

423 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 423 result(s)

High Court

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging DRT Order as Time-Barred Under Section 17(1) of SARFAESI Act. Limitation Period of 45 Days for Filing Securitisation Application is Mandatory and Cannot Be Extended by the Tribunal.

23 Mar 2026

The petitioner, M/s. Zen Lifecare Ltd., challenged the orders of the Debt Recovery Tribunal-I, Ahmedabad, dated 20th November 2020 and 6th February 20...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Polluter Pays Principle in Tannery Pollution Case — Directs Comprehensive Compensation and Remediation for Environmental Degradation in Vellore District. The court affirmed that tanneries are strictly liable for ecological damage and health impacts, and the Loss of Ecology Authority's compensation assessment must be enforced with government backup liability.

13 Feb 2025

The Supreme Court of India delivered a landmark judgment addressing the severe environmental degradation caused by tannery industries in Vellore Distr...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Directs Shifting of Date for Determining Market Value Due to Inordinate Delay. Compensation to be Determined as on Date of Award Instead of Preliminary Notification Under Section 28 of KIAD Act, 1966.

2 Jan 2025

The appellants, Bernard Francis Joseph Vaz and others, purchased residential sites in Gottigere Village, Bengaluru between 1995 and 1997. On 3rd April...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Freezing of Demat Accounts of Promoter for Non-Compliant Company Under SEBI Circulars — Violation of Natural Justice and Proportionality. Freezing of all securities held by a promoter in a non-compliant company, including unrelated investments, without notice or hearing is arbitrary and illegal under Article 14, 21, and 300A of the Constitution.

26 Aug 2024

The Bombay High Court allowed two writ petitions filed by Dr. Pradeep Mehta and his son Neil Pradeep Mehta challenging the freezing of their demat acc...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Overrules PV Narasimha Rao, Holds Bribery Not Protected by Parliamentary Privilege — Legislators Who Accept Bribes for Speech or Vote Are Not Immune from Prosecution Under Articles 105(2) and 194(2) of the Constitution.

4 Mar 2024

The Supreme Court of India, in a seven-judge bench decision, overruled its earlier majority judgment in PV Narasimha Rao v. State (CBI/SPE) (1998) 4 S...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Appeals Against Single Judge Order in Company Dispute Over Bank Account Freezing. The Court held that the writ petition was maintainable but the interim relief of defreezing accounts was not justified as there was a prima facie case of mismanagement and balance of convenience favored maintaining status quo.

13 Jul 2021

The case involves two writ appeals filed by Mr. Manne Guru Prasad and Shri Ramappa against an order dated 06.04.2021 passed by a learned Single Judge ...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Writ Appeals Against Single Judge Order in Company Dispute Over Bank Account Freezing. The court held that disputes regarding management of a company are not maintainable under writ jurisdiction and must be raised before the Company Law Board under the Companies Act, 2013.

13 Jul 2021

The case involves two writ appeals filed by individuals against an order of a Single Judge of the Karnataka High Court in a writ petition filed by M/s...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows MPID Act Appeal for Return of Seized Property to Accused Pending Trial — Property Not Proceeds of Crime Under MPID Act. Court holds that Section 3 of MPID Act does not authorize continued retention of property not linked to deposits, and directs release of vehicle and cash to appellant subject to conditions.

30 Nov 2017

The Bombay High Court allowed Criminal Appeal No. 813 of 2016 filed by Suresh Raju Shetty, challenging an order of the Designated Court under the Maha...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement to Sell Not Proved and Suit Barred by Limitation. Plaintiff failed to prove execution of agreement and suit was filed beyond three years from notice of refusal under Article 54 of Limitation Act, 1963.

30 Nov -0001

The appellant, Sandeep Kashinath Parab, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell dated 15/06/1998 allegedly executed by the respo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Against SARFAESI Proceedings by DBS Bank — Foreign Bank Not Required to Register Under Section 2(1)(c) of SARFAESI Act for Enforcement of Security Interest. The court held that a foreign bank with a branch in India is a 'bank' under Section 2(1)(c) read with the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, and can enforce security interest under Section 13 of the SARFAESI Act.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment involves two writ petitions: Writ Petition No. 1338 of 2016 filed by Narendra Plastic Private Limited and Neemit Punamiya against DBS Ban...

36 37 38 39 40

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)