Search Results for "panch witness admission"

870 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 870 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment for Husband in Wife's Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Motive. Conviction under Section 302 and 201 IPC confirmed as chain of circumstances complete and consistent with guilt.

The appellant, Dashrath Dada Salunkhe, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Malashiras for the murder of his wife Vimal @ Anita and for cau...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Convict in POCSO and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Medical Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(i) IPC and Section 4 POCSO Act set aside as victim's testimony was unreliable and medical evidence did not support penetration.

The appellant, Siddharth @ Bollywood S/o Bapurao Meshram, was convicted by the Special Judge, Wardha for offences under Section 376(2)(i) and Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Age of Victim. Conviction under Section 376(2)(i) IPC and Section 4 POCSO Act set aside as prosecution failed to establish victim's minority and guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Siddharth @ Bollywood S/o Bapurao Meshram, was convicted by the Special Judge, Wardha for offences under Section 376(2)(i) IPC, Section...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Motive and Relied on Unreliable Witnesses.

The appellant, Shivaji Raghunath Dhadam, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for the murder of Ramesh Pandurang Dhadam, and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Prevention of Corruption Act Case Due to Defective Sanction and Probable Defence. Demand for Amount Held to Be Visit Fees and Medicine Expenses, Not Illegal Gratification, Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

This criminal appeal arises from a conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The appellant, a veterinary doctor employed at Panchayat S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Credible Witnesses. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Fails as Prosecution Witnesses Turn Hostile and Medical Evidence Does Not Support the Prosecution Case.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment of the Sessions Court acquitting the respondents of offences under Sections 302, 324, 201, 149,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Extra-Judicial Confession and Incomplete Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Ramesh and Mukinda Sabhadinde, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Washim for the murder of their father Ramchandra under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Kidnapping and Rape of Minor Under POCSO Act — Age of Victim Determined by Ossification Test and School Records, Consent Irrelevant for Minor.

The appellant, Sujoy @ Sanjay Laltu Chakravarty, was convicted by the Special Judge, Gondia, in Special POCSO Case No. 11/2014 for offences under Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Robbery Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 394 and 397 IPC Set Aside as Testimony of Sole Eyewitness Found Unreliable and Medical Evidence Inconsistent.

The case involves two criminal appeals filed by three accused persons convicted under Sections 394 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for robbery ...