Search Results for "original cash advance"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...

Search Results for "original cash advance"

458 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 458 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case — Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act Not Rebutted. Trial Court Erred in Not Framing Proper Points of Determination and Ignoring Legal Presumption in Favour of Complainant.

12 Feb 2014

The appellant, original complainant Sunil Thukral, filed a criminal appeal against the judgment and order dated 19/01/2011 of the Judicial Magistrate ...

High Court

SECOND APPEAL NO. 148 OF 2016

21 Dec 2016

The dispute centered on rights to perform pooja and collect offerings at Goddess Shree Rupa Bhavani Temple in Solapur, registered as a public trust. T...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Eviction Suit: Co-owners of Dissolved Partnership Firm Have Locus to Terminate Tenancy Without Attornment or Public Notice Under Section 45 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932. The court held that the co-ownership arrangement was a family arrangement and not a transfer, and the defendant's conduct established jural relationship.

18 Dec 2019

The appeal arises from a suit for eviction and mesne profits filed by the original plaintiffs, seventeen individuals claiming as co-owners of a shop p...

High Court

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

1 Jan 1970

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Seeking Enforcement of Consent Terms Against Non-Signatory Defendant in Debenture Dispute. Interpretation of Consent Decree Held That Clause 11(a) Obligation to Pay Was Only on Defendant No.5, Not Defendant No.6, Who Was Not a Party to the Consent Terms.

29 Jan 2015

The case involves two appeals filed by the original Defendant No.5 (Dewanchand Ramsaran Trading Pvt. Ltd. and others) against a common order of the le...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Dispute Due to Lack of Fraud Pleadings and Limitation Bar. Suit challenging registered sale deed after 14 years dismissed as plaintiff failed to prove fraud and suit was barred by limitation under Article 59 of Limitation Act.

15 Oct 2016

The case involves a second appeal arising from a suit filed by the plaintiff (respondent no.1) seeking a declaration that a registered sale deed dated...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Reserves Judgment on Writ Petitions Challenging Permanent Lok Adalat Order in Banking Fraud Compensation Claim — Jurisdiction of Permanent Lok Adalat Under Section 22C of Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 Raised Due to Alleged Criminal Misconduct by Third Parties. The dispute involved unauthorised online transfers from a bank account enabled by a duplicate SIM issued without consent, leading to claims for compensation and questions on the Lok Adalat's adjudicatory powers in fraud cases.

1 Jun 2026

The High Court of Karnataka heard two connected writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, challenging the order of the Perm...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Removal of Managing Committee Members in Co-operative Housing Society for Violation of Section 78A MCS Act — Disqualification for One Term Upheld. The court held that the Deputy Registrar's order removing petitioners from managing committee and disqualifying them for one term was valid as they failed to comply with statutory requirements under Section 78A of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960.

21 Feb 2025

The petitioners, members of JVPD Sterling CHS Ltd., challenged orders dated 13th January 2023 passed by the Deputy Registrar, Co-operative Societies, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Probate Petition for Will and Codicil of Dr. Bharati Nanavati Due to Suspicious Circumstances and Failure to Dispel Doubts. Court holds that propounders must prove due execution and testamentary capacity beyond suspicion, and failure to examine attesting witnesses or explain unnatural bequests leads to rejection of probate.

22 Feb 2018

The judgment concerns two testamentary proceedings: a Miscellaneous Petition No. 39 of 2004 in Testamentary Petition No. 233 of 2004 and a Testamentar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Probate Petition for Will and Codicil of Dr. Bharati Nanavati Due to Suspicious Circumstances and Failure to Prove Execution. Court finds that the Will and Codicil were not proved in accordance with Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, and Section 68 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, due to lack of attesting witnesses and suspicious circumstances surrounding the documents.

22 Feb 2018

The judgment concerns two connected matters: a Miscellaneous Petition (No. 39 of 2004) and a Testamentary Suit (No. 4 of 2005), both relating to the e...

36 37 38 39 40

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)