Search Results for "oral tenancy"

1125 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1125 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Lease Dispute Due to Improper Points for Determination and Violation of Evidence Act. Appellate Court's reliance on oral evidence despite requirement of written lease under Clause 4 of agreement dated 04/05/1977 held erroneous.

The case involves a second appeal arising from a suit for possession and mesne profits concerning a property in Mapusa, Goa. The appellants (defendant...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in MHADA Tenement Dispute — Plaintiffs Fail to Prove Right to Use New Room Allotted to Defendant. Claim of Common Baithak for Villagers Not Established as Tenancy Was in Name of Deceased Husband.

The appellants, original plaintiffs, filed a suit for declaration and injunction in respect of a tenement of MHADA. They claimed that they, along with...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Administrative Tribunal Order in Land Dispute. Court upholds concurrent findings that petitioners failed to prove tenancy or ownership over disputed property under the Goa, Daman and Diu Agricultural Tenancy Act, 1964 and the Portuguese Civil Code.

The case involves a writ petition filed by the legal representatives of Smt. Jaiwanti Narayan Kamat (since deceased) against an order of the Administr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Examines Whether Appeal is Barred by Res Judicata and Abatement in Suit for Specific Performance; Court Notes that Plaintiffs Did Not Appeal Decree in Companion Suit and Failed to Bring All Legal Heirs On Record.

The appeal arises from the judgment and decree dated 18.03.2000 passed by the trial court in Special Civil Suit No. 176 of 1991 and Regular Civil Suit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Appoints Court Receiver in Property Dispute Between Family Members Over Sonal Building and Flat No.3A. Court Receiver appointed under Order XL CPC for building and flat, with power to appoint agent for use on payment of compensation.

The present Notice of Motion was taken out by the plaintiff, Rohit Vanmalidas Mehta, in a suit pending before the Bombay High Court. The dispute perta...