Search Results for "mesne profits"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "mesne profits"

558 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 558 result(s)

High Court

High Court Quashes Trial Court Order Appointing Court Commissioner in Encroachment Suit as Premature Before Plaintiff's Evidence. Appointment Under Section 75 Read with Order 26 Rule 9 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, is Impermissible for Evidence Collection When Plaintiff Has Not Yet Discharged Burden of Proof in Mandatory Injunction Suit Regarding Government-Acquired Land.

24 Mar 2026

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, heard a writ petition challenging an order dated 18.07.2024 passed by the Civil Judge, Senio...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition for DNA Test in Paternity Dispute Under Order 26 Rule 10(a) CPC and Section 112 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872. The court set aside the Trial Court's rejection of the application for DNA test, holding that scientific evidence is necessary to determine paternity when disputed.

27 Sep 2024

The petitioner, Chandru, filed a suit (O.S.No.5/2017) before the Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Hirekerur, claiming that defendant No.1, Huchcharayappa ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Property Declaration Suit — Failure to Prove Title and Possession. Suit for declaration of title and injunction dismissed as plaintiff failed to establish ownership and possession over suit property; appellate court affirms trial court's findings on lack of evidence.

23 Aug 2019

The appellant, Sri N. Krishnamurthy, filed a suit for declaration of title and permanent injunction in respect of suit property against the Corporatio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Appointment of Court Commissioner for Evidence Collection in Civil Suit — Appointment for Collecting Evidence Held Impermissible Under Order XXVI Rule 9 CPC.

23 Jan 2018

The case involves a writ petition filed by the defendants (petitioners) challenging an order of the 8th Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Karad, dat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Dispute Over Encroachment and Adverse Possession — Mud-Ridge Boundary and Survey Error Lead to Reversal of Appellate Decree. The court held that the appellate court erred in reversing the trial court's decree as the plaintiff proved title and possession, and the defendants failed to establish adverse possession.

6 Dec 2013

The appellant, Bento Antonio Gomes, filed a suit for possession and permanent injunction against the respondents, alleging that a recent survey errone...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Allows Writ Petition Challenging Appointment of Court Commissioner for Measurement of Land in Suit for Injunction — Held that Appointment of Commissioner at Preliminary Stage without Framing Issues and Recording Evidence is Premature and Amounts to Deciding Substantive Rights.

15 Nov 2010

The petitioner, Shaikh Isak s/o Shaikh Amir, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 06.03.2010 passed by the Civil Judge, J.D., Parli Vaijna...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Partition Suit Valuation Dispute — Court Fee Payable Under Section 6(iv)(d) of Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959 on Market Value of Plaintiff's Share. Suit for partition and possession of agricultural land valued at Rs.4,60,000/- held to be properly valued under Section 6(iv)(d) and not under Section 6(iv)(ha) of the Act.

29 Jul 2010

The petitioner, Sau. Asha Sopan Maithane, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 02.09.2009 passed by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Kha...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Partnership Dispute — Plaintiff Entitled to Possession of Business and Premises. Court holds that a partnership at will can be dissolved by notice and the plaintiff as sole proprietor is entitled to recover possession from the defendant who was a partner.

26 Jul 2005

The appellant, Chandrakant Kanoji Parab, filed a suit for recovery of possession of a business called M/s Ramesh Electric Works and the premises where...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment of Written Statement to Include Counterclaim in Specific Performance Suit — No Bar Under Order VIII Rule 6A CPC for Counterclaim Arising After Filing Suit. The court held that a counterclaim arising after the suit but before filing of written statement can be introduced by amendment under Order VI Rule 17 CPC, and such counterclaim is not barred by limitation if filed within three years under Article 113 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

20 Jan 2005

The petitioner, Mrs. Ivy Muriet Fonseca, was the defendant in Special Civil Suit No. 85/2001/C filed by the respondent, Mr. Porus Adi Dotor, seeking s...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Suit for Declaration of Ownership and Injunction Dismissed as Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Title and Possession.

30 Nov -0001

The present second appeal arises out of a civil suit for declaration of ownership and permanent injunction filed by the original plaintiffs (now appel...

36 37 38 39 40

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)