Search Results for "hindu undivided family"

482 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 482 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Partition Appeal for Lack of Evidence of Joint Family Property. Court holds that plaintiffs failed to prove that suit properties were ancestral joint family properties, and the suit was barred by limitation and res judicata.

The appeal arises from a judgment and decree dated 30.01.2018 passed by the Senior Civil Judge, Kolar, in O.S. No. 42/2012, dismissing the suit for pa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Refusal to Dismiss Suit Under Order IX Rule 5 CPC. Order IX Rule 5 CPC does not apply when summons were never issued to defendants, and the provision is directory, allowing court discretion to extend time for service.

The petitioner, Sanjay Madanchand Kashyap, who was defendant no.1 in Special Civil Suit No.769 of 2012, filed a writ petition challenging the order da...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal of Temporary Injunction in Property Suit — Appellants Failed to Establish Prima Facie Case for Injunction Against Alienation of Joint Family Property.

The appellants, Smt. Shubhangi Nandakishor Gaidhani and others, filed an appeal against an order of the trial court refusing to grant a temporary inju...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Revision Against Trial Court's Jurisdiction Ruling in SARFAESI Act Suit. Civil Court Has Jurisdiction to Entertain Suit for Permanent Injunction Against Re-auction of Mortgaged Property Despite SARFAESI Act Provisions.

The respondent, original plaintiff, filed Regular Civil Suit No.1756 of 2014 seeking a permanent injunction restraining the applicant bank from re-auc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Eviction Decree for Bonafide Requirement in Rent Control Case. Landlords' need for suit premises held genuine despite acquisition of additional rooms under Section 13(1)(g) of Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947.

The original defendant (petitioner) was a tenant in suit premises consisting of two rooms admeasuring 10 ft X 10 ft and 8 ft X 10 ft. The plaintiffs (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Under Maharashtra Project Affected Persons Rehabilitation Act, 1986 — Acquisition Quashed for Violation of Section 10(3) Limitation on Holding Land Below 8 Acres.

The petitioners, owners of lands in the benefited zone, challenged the acquisition of their lands under the Maharashtra Project Affected Persons Rehab...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Insolvency Notice Against Partners Not Impleaded in Suit — Leave Under Order 21 Rule 50(2) CPC Required. Insolvency Notice Against Alleged Partners Without Prior Leave Under Order 21 Rule 50(2) CPC is Invalid as It Is a Step in Execution.

The judgment debtors, M/s. Shiva Trading Corporation (a firm) and its alleged partners Gulab S. Daga and Jatin Devi Daga, filed a motion to set aside ...