Search Results for "government order cancellation"

2189 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2189 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Arbitration Award in Property Dispute — No Grounds for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act. Court upholds award based on joint family property partition and limitation, finding no patent illegality or perversity.

The petitioners, who were members of a joint family, challenged an arbitral award passed in a partition dispute. The award had been made by an arbitra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Stamp Duty on Development Agreement Under Section 47(c)(5) of Maharashtra Stamp Act — Purpose of Instrument Failed. Development Agreement is an instrument covered under Section 47(c)(5) for refund when the purpose fails, and Section 48 is only a limitation provision.

The petitioner, M/s. Chandiwala Enterprises, a registered partnership firm, entered into a Development Agreement with Neel Ashiward CHS Ltd. on 2nd Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Quashes Externment Order for Lack of Subjective Satisfaction and Non-Application of Mind — Petitioner's Criminal Antecedents Not Sufficient to Justify Externment Under Section 56(1)(a) & (b) of Maharashtra Police Act, 1951.

The petitioner, Sachin Sanjay Raut, filed a criminal writ petition before the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur seeking quashing of an externment order d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Release of Imported Bearings in IPR Suspension Case — Mandamus Issued for Violation of IPR Rules 2007. Customs Authorities Suspended Clearance Without Confiscation Order or Notice Under Rule 7 of IPR Rules, Violating Principles of Natural Justice.

The petitioners, NBU Bearings Pvt. Ltd. and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Highest Bidder in Excise Case; Holds Cancellation of Sale Invalid and Directs Grant of Licences. Interpretation of Rule 19 of Mysore Excise Rules: Requirements of Statement and Security Inapplicable When Shops in Multiple Tehsils, and 'At Once' Means Reasonable Time.

In an appeal before the Supreme Court of India, the appellant, who was the highest bidder for the exclusive privilege of retail vend of toddy and arra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Act Due to Unexplained Delay in Execution. Delay of 14 Months in Serving Detention Order Renders Subjective Satisfaction Stale and Detention Invalid Under Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA Act, 1974.

The petitioner, father of the detenu, filed a writ of habeas corpus under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging a detention order dated 2/8/2008...