Search Results for "contract enforcement"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "contract enforcement"

1647 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1647 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Tender Dispute, Upholding Limited Judicial Review Under Article 226 of Constitution of India. The Court Reiterated That Judicial Interference in Tender Awards is Restricted to Cases of Arbitrariness or Irrationality, and Courts Must Defer to the Tendering Authority's Interpretation of Contract Terms.

17 Sep 2021

The Supreme Court of India addressed a civil appeal concerning the scope of judicial review in tender matters under Article 226 of the Constitution. T...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Majority Arbitral Award in Maritime Demurrage Dispute — Claim Time-Barred Under Charterparty Clause 24. The court upheld the majority arbitrators' finding that the demurrage claim was received beyond the 45-day period stipulated in clause 24 of the Tanker Voyage Charterparty, and thus the claim was time-barred.

4 Jan 2012

The petitioner, Axios Navigation Co. Ltd., a shipowner, challenged a majority arbitral award dated 18 August 2008 passed by a three-member Arbitral Tr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Application to File Written Statement and Counterclaim Under Order 8 Rule 1 CPC — Petitioner Failed to Show Sufficient Cause for Delay Beyond 90 Days. The court upheld the trial court's discretion in refusing to condone the inordinate and unexplained delay in filing the written statement, holding that the statutory period under Order 8 Rule 1 CPC cannot be extended beyond 90 days except in exceptional circumstances.

28 Aug 2019

The petitioner, Vesta Building Products Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 30 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Ex-Promoters' Gratuity Claims, Holds Directors in Control Not 'Employees' Under Payment of Gratuity Act. Founders who were in absolute control of company affairs cannot claim gratuity as employees despite drawing salary, as they fall outside the definition of 'employee' under Section 2(e) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972.

20 Aug 2024

The petitioners, Anil Govind Ganu and Ashwini Anil Ganu, were the founders and directors of Innovative Technomics Pvt. Ltd. They claimed gratuity for ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Section 9 Application for Unregistered Partnership Firm. Section 69(3) of the Partnership Act, 1932 Bars Interim Relief Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for Unregistered Firm.

15 Dec 2006

The appellant, Masood Mohmmed Husain, filed an appeal against the rejection of his application under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act Against Single Judge Order Dismissing Section 34 Petition Due to Foreign Seat and Governing Law — Interpretation of Escrow Agreement Clauses

31 Oct 2018

The appeal arose from a Commercial Appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Katra Holdings Ltd., a Mauritius co...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petition Seeking Enforcement of RBI COVID-19 Moratorium Package. Petitioner Challenges Banks' Denial of Moratorium Under RBI Circular Dated 27.03.2020.

8 Jul 2020

Velankani Information Systems Limited, a company operating an IT park and a five-star hotel in Bengaluru, availed term loans aggregating Rs. 475 crore...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Hears Builders' Challenge to Provident Fund Coverage of Casual Construction Workers. Para 26(2) Amendment to Provident Fund Scheme Removes Waiting Period, Requiring Membership from Date of Joining.

28 Feb 2006

Three writ petitions were filed by builders—Sandeep Dwellers Pvt. Ltd., M/s. R.B. Constructions, and Builders Association of India with its members�...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Pre-deposit Condition Under SARFAESI Act — Upholds Constitutional Validity of Section 18 Provisos. The court held that the legislature may condition the right of appeal and the provisions are not discriminatory compared to the RDB Act.

1 Jul 2011

The petitioners, National Polymers and others, challenged an order dated 6 April 2011 of the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal directing them to depos...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Enforcement Directorate Appeals in FERA Contravention Cases Due to Lack of Evidence and Limitation. Held that mere suspicion cannot substitute proof and that adjudication proceedings under FERA must be initiated within a reasonable time.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves a batch of appeals filed by the Union of India through the Enforcement Directorate against orders of the Appellate Tribunal for Fore...

36 37 38 39 40

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)