Search Results for "constituent"

417 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 417 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Proof of Demand. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to establish demand and acceptance of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Dattatraya Rajaram Thaokar, a retired government servant, was convicted by the Special Judge, Nagpur in Special Case No. 25/1991 for of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Section 7 and Section 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Subhash s/o Narayanraoji Rathod, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Wardha, in Special Case No. 4/1997 for offences under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Auditor in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Proof of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to establish demand and voluntary acceptance of illegal gratification.

The appellant, Jagdish Dhanurdhar Kalbage, an Auditor by profession, was convicted by the Special Judge, Washim in Special Case 1/1999 for offences pu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness. Conviction under Section 5(1)(d) read with 5(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and Section 161 IPC set aside as sole trap witness was interested and testimony uncorroborated.

The appellant, Shridhar Ramkrushna Fale, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Akola, for offences under Section 5(1)(d) read with Section 5...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Inconsistent Evidence. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Gajanan s/o Lobhaji Dahale, was convicted by the Special Judge, Pusad, for offences under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Erroneous Finding of Negligence and Inadequate Compensation. Deceased pedestrian hit by auto rickshaw; court held that the driver was negligent and enhanced compensation under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by the legal heirs of Arjun Bhalekar, who died in a vehicular accident on 29.9.2010. The deceased wa...