Search Results for "concurrent prosecution"

738 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 738 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Insufficient Evidence and Unreliable Confession. Conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860, set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt based on confession and circumstantial evidence.

The Supreme Court of India heard criminal appeals filed by four appellants challenging their conviction for murder under Section 302 read with Section...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Failure to Explain Injuries. Conviction under Sections 302/149 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by eight accused persons against their conviction for murder and attempted murder. The case arose from an ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Husband in Murder Case Due to Incomplete Circumstantial Evidence and Unreliable Witness. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Reversed as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt Despite Death in Matrimonial Home.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal of Jayantilal Verma, who was convicted under Section 302 IPC for the murder of his wife, Sahodara Bai. The incide...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder of Wife and Assault on Neighbour — Life Imprisonment Confirmed. Eye Witness Testimony and Medical Evidence Found Sufficient to Sustain Conviction Under Sections 302 and 324 IPC.

The appellant, Mahendra Vasudeo Gavas, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Sindhudurg at Oros, for the murder of his wife Mayuri under Sec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Rash Driving Causing Death and Injuries in Hit-and-Run Case. Revision Petitioner's Conviction Under Sections 279, 337, 304A IPC and Section 134(a)(b) r/w 187 MV Act Confirmed as Evidence of Rashness and Negligence Was Clear.

The revision petitioner, Mr. Vimanjan Hanumanta Devarkonda, was the original accused in a criminal case arising from a road accident that occurred on ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Cheating and Forgery Case Due to Lack of Evidence. Conviction under Sections 417, 419, 420, 468 read with 471 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove charges beyond reasonable doubt.

The case involves a criminal revision petition filed by the petitioners (accused No.1 and 2) against the judgment of conviction and sentence dated 24....